Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
MaddowBlog-'No Kings' protests, special election results leave no doubt about the backlash to Trump
Between activism, election results and protest turnout, the prevailing political winds suggest the backlash to the president is real.
What recent special election results and the turnout at the “No Kings†protests have in common:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-06-16T12:04:53.351Z
They both offer compelling evidence that the backlash to Trump is real and substantial. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/no-kings-protests-special-election-results-leave-no-doubt-backlash-tru-rcna213209
Headed into last week’s state legislative special elections, Democrats were confident about a contest in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The state House race was in a district that Kamala Harris carried by 19 points, and the party’s candidate, Amanda Clinton, appeared well positioned to do at least as well.
The good news for Democrats was that their candidate prevailed. The better news for Democrats was the margin: Clinton won a 69-point landslide, easily surpassing expectations.
In elections and special elections throughout the country, results like these have become rather common lately. After last week’s special elections in multiple states, The Downballot reported, “Overall, in 29 special elections this year, Democratic candidates have run 16.4 points ahead of the 2024 presidential results on average.” G. Elliott Morris, the former director of data analytics at FiveThirtyEight, published a related analysis that pointed in the same direction.
.......Of course, the election data isn’t the only relevant evidence. Take Saturday’s “No Kings” events, for example. As The Washington Post reported:
.......By any fair measure, the numbers were massive, not “miniscule.”
Indeed, around this time 16 years ago, there were so-called “Tea Party” gatherings, which generated considerable coverage and conversation, and which were seen as evidence of a burgeoning backlash against Barack Obama’s agenda. But at no point could Tea Partiers generate anything comparable to the kind of numbers Donald Trump’s critics generated on Saturday.
The broader significance deserves the political world’s attention: After Trump’s 2024 victory, Americans heard a lot of talk, not only about Republican dominance and “realignment” results that would keep the GOP in power for a long while, but also about the idea that the anti-Trump resistance was a spent force. The president’s opponents and other democracy advocates, the argument went, were finished. The political playing field belonged to an energized and invigorated right.
Between activism, election results and protest turnout, those assumptions about the prevailing political winds are due for a reassessment. The backlash to Trump is real.
The good news for Democrats was that their candidate prevailed. The better news for Democrats was the margin: Clinton won a 69-point landslide, easily surpassing expectations.
In elections and special elections throughout the country, results like these have become rather common lately. After last week’s special elections in multiple states, The Downballot reported, “Overall, in 29 special elections this year, Democratic candidates have run 16.4 points ahead of the 2024 presidential results on average.” G. Elliott Morris, the former director of data analytics at FiveThirtyEight, published a related analysis that pointed in the same direction.
.......Of course, the election data isn’t the only relevant evidence. Take Saturday’s “No Kings” events, for example. As The Washington Post reported:
Americans turned out en masse in communities across the country Saturday, raucously pushing back on what they see as President Donald Trump’s widening authoritarianism, attacks on immigrants and deep cuts to scores of federal programs.
.......By any fair measure, the numbers were massive, not “miniscule.”
Indeed, around this time 16 years ago, there were so-called “Tea Party” gatherings, which generated considerable coverage and conversation, and which were seen as evidence of a burgeoning backlash against Barack Obama’s agenda. But at no point could Tea Partiers generate anything comparable to the kind of numbers Donald Trump’s critics generated on Saturday.
The broader significance deserves the political world’s attention: After Trump’s 2024 victory, Americans heard a lot of talk, not only about Republican dominance and “realignment” results that would keep the GOP in power for a long while, but also about the idea that the anti-Trump resistance was a spent force. The president’s opponents and other democracy advocates, the argument went, were finished. The political playing field belonged to an energized and invigorated right.
Between activism, election results and protest turnout, those assumptions about the prevailing political winds are due for a reassessment. The backlash to Trump is real.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
