Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Polybius

(20,311 posts)
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:44 PM Jun 16

The New York Times Leads the Movement to Stop Zohran Mamdani

With little over one week left until the mayoral primary, Zohran Mamdani’s momentum against Andrew Cuomo is drawing widespread opposition to stop him from winning the Democratic nomination and likely City Hall.

On Monday, the New York Times editorial board slammed Mamdani as unfit to be mayor. It was practically an anti-endorsement from the board, which announced last year that it would abstain from endorsements in municipal elections. “Mr. Mamdani would also bring less relevant experience than perhaps any mayor in New York history. He has never run a government department or private organization of any size. As a state legislator, he has struggled to execute his own agenda,” the board wrote.

The board reluctantly favored Cuomo over the 33-year-old upstart. “We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers’ ballots,” it said. “His experience is too thin, and his agenda reads like a turbocharged version of Mr. de Blasio’s dismaying mayoralty. As for Mr. Cuomo, we have serious objections to his ethics and conduct, even if he would be better for New York’s future than Mr. Mamdani.”

The Times appeared to echo a similar anti-endorsement from the famously conservative New York Post editorial board that harshly denounced Mamdani’s campaign, calling the lawmaker a “uniquely awful menace, an utter guarantee of disaster for New York.”

Read more...

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RandySF

(75,314 posts)
1. He has an antisemitic element around him even though he finally recognized Israel's right to exist.
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:46 PM
Jun 16

The Times, however, could have endorsed a candidate who wasn't Cuomo or Mandami.

Polybius

(20,311 posts)
2. He recognized it, but he refused to say if it should remain a Jewish State
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:48 PM
Jun 16

On a side note, I can't believe the guy is only 33.

dsc

(52,976 posts)
6. To be fair they did
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:58 PM
Jun 16

Brad Lander got the most positive review. What they did do was say not to rank Mamdani. He was the only one they said not to rank.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
8. He parses his words very carefully on that. His view is "right to exist", but not as a Jewish state.
Mon Jun 16, 2025, 11:59 PM
Jun 16

Even though that is is how the British partition defined it, along with the UN Partition plan for a Jewish State, and a separate Palestinian state.

Response to Polybius (Original post)

AZProgressive

(29,606 posts)
10. He seems like the best candidate
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:04 AM
Tuesday

I feel that Democratic Socialists are best at addressing issues in urban centers but maybe not so much in rural areas but Cuomo had to resign in disgrace and would most likely serve the business interests over the rest of the city.

De Blasio actually seems the most normal of the recent mayors Giuliani, Bloomberg, and Eric Adams

Polybius

(20,311 posts)
13. Bloomberg's third term was bad, with all of that nanny-state stuff like banning large sodas
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:39 PM
Tuesday

But his first term was elite, and his second was pretty good too.

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,117 posts)
11. So they are going with the guy who had to resign his office in disgrace for being a sex pest...
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:04 AM
Tuesday

Oneironaut

(6,029 posts)
14. He's bad for the Billionaire class
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:44 PM
Tuesday

He’s a direct threat to their ability to avoid accountability and fleece the working class for their wealth and resources.

Oneironaut

(6,029 posts)
17. He is a Socialist, however.
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 01:08 PM
Tuesday

If you look at his platform, it is a pro-worker, Socialist platform. It doesn't matter if he came from wealth or not.

JI7

(92,133 posts)
18. Socialism is a failure and there is nothing to show
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 03:44 PM
Tuesday

he has done anything for non wealthy.

Oneironaut

(6,029 posts)
19. Nonsense! Socialism can be broken down into many different policies - some better than others.
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 07:03 PM
Tuesday

Also, Zohran is a Democratic Socialist. I am not what I would say is a fan of his, but, some of his proposed Socialist policies, such as improving public transportation, are wonderful ideas!

JI7

(92,133 posts)
15. He doesn't seem to have a problem with all the Muslim states being Muslim states
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:49 PM
Tuesday

but has a problem with one tiny Jewish state which he seems to think shouldn't be a Jewish state. Even though there are 25 percent non Jews there. How many non muslims are in the many Muslim states ?

Well, there is Iran also where majority are non Muslim but people are defensive over the Islamic regime that is imposing this on to them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New York Times Leads ...