Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

imanamerican63

(15,144 posts) Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:18 PM Yesterday

Oh so close, but it is an obliteration failure!

Release results say that they hit the target, but only did some damage!

I thought Drunken Pete said that the bunkers were obliterated?

Maybe to much scotch Petie?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh so close, but it is an obliteration failure! (Original Post) imanamerican63 Yesterday OP

Sort of obliteration defenestration...or something.... wcmagumba Yesterday #1

Tactical nuke next. nt doc03 Yesterday #2

You cannot trust what these liars say. surfered Yesterday #3

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Yesterday #4

not sure what parties were intended for 'help' stopdiggin 23 hrs ago #5

wcmagumba

(4,126 posts)

1. Sort of obliteration defenestration...or something....

Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:22 PM

Yesterday

doc03

(37,996 posts)

2. Tactical nuke next. nt

Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:22 PM

Yesterday

surfered

(7,457 posts)

3. You cannot trust what these liars say.

Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 07:55 PM

Yesterday

Response to imanamerican63 (Original post)

PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.

stopdiggin

(13,936 posts)

5. not sure what parties were intended for 'help'

Reply to PeaceWave (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 22, 2025, 08:33 PM

23 hrs ago

what is does point to - is a mission that was oversold - and a result that was overstated. (i.e. they are lying again). Anyway - that was my take on the intention for the post.

Reply to this discussion