Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(50,318 posts)
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 09:32 AM Jun 23

What we should be hearing today in the news...everywhere:

1) Assessments of the Iran bombing show there was no fallout, which means the mission was a failure.

2) Why did it fail? In all probability, a Russian mole in Trump's organization gave an eye wink to Russia, and Russia told Iran to move the missiles before the strike. And who was Trump's intelligence director? Tulsi Gabbard. A known Russian sympathizer. Poor Trump has to learn the hard way. Here he was thinking that she would be an asset for him with Putin, and in the end, he couldn't trust her judgement because, well, when she said that Iran was not a direct threat to the USA, was it because it was true? Or because she was protecting Russia's best interest? What a quandary he created for himself.

3) Oil prices are due to go up because Iran retaliated by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz.

In the end, Trump just did a pile on of his shit-show.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What we should be hearing today in the news...everywhere: (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Jun 23 OP
Facts be damned, Trump continues saying he "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites: "That's my story and I'm sticking to it." sop Jun 23 #1
He's been known to lie! spanone Jun 23 #7
Is there any estimate on the human factor stillcool Jun 23 #2
Illegal attack by Israel and the United States malaise Jun 23 #3
Curious? Could the heads up be a concern for cachukis Jun 23 #4
One of the papers said he was influenced by Baitball Blogger Jun 23 #5
Agree that it may have influenced. What have we cachukis Jun 23 #6
They voted for a man who owes his Baitball Blogger Jun 23 #15
You'd have to be an idiot not to have seen it coming. Grins Jun 23 #8
There is no security in the U.S.'s security apparatus anymore PJMcK Jun 23 #9
A maga guy that I used to be friends with has a trucking biz louis-t Jun 23 #10
The bombed facility was an enrichment plant thus "fallout" would not be expected. NNadir Jun 23 #11
Mango Mussolini is also a Russian asset...plus 90 percent of his confidantes JT45242 Jun 23 #12
One correction SCantiGOP Jun 23 #13
Radioactivity is not determinant of success/fail. Thurs & Fri there was lots of truck / equip activity at Fordo Bernardo de La Paz Jun 23 #14
So, to be clear... Dreamer Tatum Jun 23 #16
Our esteem president believed this was all about taking out nuclear sites. Baitball Blogger Jun 23 #17
Nope. You said they moved their MISSILES. Dreamer Tatum Jun 23 #18
What I exactly said was that maybe Russia told Iran to move their missiles. In those words. Baitball Blogger Jun 23 #19
Yup. Everything Krasnov touches dies. Joinfortmill Jun 24 #20

sop

(14,955 posts)
1. Facts be damned, Trump continues saying he "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites: "That's my story and I'm sticking to it."
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 09:48 AM
Jun 23

stillcool

(34,370 posts)
2. Is there any estimate on the human factor
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 09:57 AM
Jun 23

last night I saw something about over a thousand dead. Guess I haven't looked hard enough?

cachukis

(3,298 posts)
4. Curious? Could the heads up be a concern for
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 10:31 AM
Jun 23

blowback with the release of radiation?
Maybe someone in Pentagon was forward thinking. The goods, it seems, were removed.
Is there something else at play?
We had a clear flight in. The Israelis had cleared the way. The Iranis, after listening to the bragadaccio had to anticipate.
Could our intelligence be now so lame as to not inform trump?
Did he go in to upstage the Israelis?
Did he go to thumb his nose at Putin, whose economy is heavily in debt?
I am trying to read clues from sidelines.

Baitball Blogger

(50,318 posts)
5. One of the papers said he was influenced by
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 10:45 AM
Jun 23

The way Fox News covered the Israelis strategic bombings in Iran.

Grins

(8,542 posts)
8. You'd have to be an idiot not to have seen it coming.
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 11:39 AM
Jun 23

As soon as the orange clinical narcissist and Grand Master of the Art of the Deal said he would decide in “two weeks” - move ‘yer ass!

I also wouldn’t put it past him and MANY in his mid-administration that he would have told Putin in advance - it wouldn’t have been the first time!

PJMcK

(23,869 posts)
9. There is no security in the U.S.'s security apparatus anymore
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 11:51 AM
Jun 23

Putin (and others) now have informants in many important levels of our government. Trump has destroyed our national security system. This is why our former allies cannot trust the U.S. anymore. Trump's government cannot keep any secrets.

louis-t

(24,396 posts)
10. A maga guy that I used to be friends with has a trucking biz
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 11:52 AM
Jun 23

that he says is failing and about to go bankrupt but his buddy is going to lower gas prices and save his business.....

NNadir

(36,112 posts)
11. The bombed facility was an enrichment plant thus "fallout" would not be expected.
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 11:57 AM
Jun 23

The bombing was a failure simply because it should not have been carried out.

There is a significant chemical risk with bombing an enrichment plant because uranium hexafluoride is extremely corrosive and toxic.

Iran has a right to enrich fuel.

JT45242

(3,448 posts)
12. Mango Mussolini is also a Russian asset...plus 90 percent of his confidantes
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 12:09 PM
Jun 23

It's probably easier to list who isn't an asset or at least compromised by Putin in the administration or rethugs in Congress

Bernardo de La Paz

(56,800 posts)
14. Radioactivity is not determinant of success/fail. Thurs & Fri there was lots of truck / equip activity at Fordo
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 12:31 PM
Jun 23

Iran got tipped off or was very prudent. Perhaps they were listening in on Kegsbreath's Signal chat. Or Gabbard let buddy Putin know.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,985 posts)
16. So, to be clear...
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 01:01 PM
Jun 23

by YOUR account, not only does Iran have nuclear weapons, but they have full-on MISSILES.

Which is SO WEIRD, since I see many posts on DU claiming that Iran doesn't have a bomb, let alone a missile, and its uranium enriching is for purely chemistry experimentation.

I am SO confused. I have been assured that Iran barely has a book of matches. Now you're telling me they have nuclear-tipped missiles?

And you're SO SURE of this that you think all news outlets should be informing us of this?

I'm working today, so have a couple of tokes for me, OK?

Baitball Blogger

(50,318 posts)
17. Our esteem president believed this was all about taking out nuclear sites.
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 01:47 PM
Jun 23

If there was no sign of radiation, then it meant he failed or ... maybe Iran doesn't have any radioactive material and it's all a bluff?

Either way, the attack was Trump's folly.

Baitball Blogger

(50,318 posts)
19. What I exactly said was that maybe Russia told Iran to move their missiles. In those words.
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 02:27 PM
Jun 23

I never said nuclear-tipped missiles, though I can see why you made that assumption.

Trump attacked Iran because he believed that Iran was close to having a nuclear bomb. His words exactly:

"“I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb.

Trump’s statement aligned him with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has described a nuclear-armed Iran as an imminent threat, rather than with his own top intelligence adviser. Trump was expected to meet with national security officials in the Situation Room on Tuesday as he plans next steps."

I think most people would agree that the fear is that Iran would deliver that "nuclear bomb" through missiles, once they put it all together. Though there is no indication that they were in the process of doing it. It's just a fear. And that's what Trump used to attack, despite going against the intelligence.

However, there is no question that what Iran does have is the uranium needed to make a nuclear weapon. And if Trump had succeeded in his claims of destroying the facilities and the supplies, there should have been evidence of radiation. But there was none.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What we should be hearing...