Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS is allowing Trump's administration to 'defy the justice system as it pleases'
The U.S. Supreme Court, on Monday, June 23, halted a lower federal court ruling that blocked President Donald Trump's administration from deporting people to countries other than their own without 15 days' notice. And Barack Obama-appointed Justice Sonia Sotomayor was downright scathing in her dissent, writing, "The government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law, free to deport anyone, anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard."
Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, both Democratic appointees, joined Sotomayor in her dissent.
In an article published on June 26, Slate's Shirin Ali points to that June 23 ruling as an example of the High Court's right-wing supermajority failing to rein in the Trump Administration's "overreach."
"Less than three months after the Supreme Court shot down an injunction preventing deportations under the Alien Enemies Act," Ali explains, "it released another historic shadow docket decision. The majority of the justices chose to lift a lower court judge's injunction that had, up until Monday, prevented the federal government from removing immigrants from the U.S. to third countries, instead of their home country of origin, without at least giving them advance notice and allowing them to object on the grounds that they face torture there . The Supreme Court's intervention comes after the Trump Administration repeatedly violated U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's orders by attempting to send migrants to South Sudan, Libya, and El Salvador."
Ali continues, "The targets of this scheme argue that they will be tortured and killed if removed to these countries, making their expulsions unlawful under the Convention Against Torture and various federal laws. Murphy ruled that, at a minimum, the government must tell migrants where they are being sent, and give them an opportunity to object, with the assistance of counsel, on the grounds that they'll be tortured there."
Ali agrees with Sotomayor's dissent, arguing that the June 23 decision "shocks the conscience" because it "effectively allows the federal government to get away scot-free with defying a lower court judge's order, establishing an extraordinarily dangerous precedent."
Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, both Democratic appointees, joined Sotomayor in her dissent.
In an article published on June 26, Slate's Shirin Ali points to that June 23 ruling as an example of the High Court's right-wing supermajority failing to rein in the Trump Administration's "overreach."
"Less than three months after the Supreme Court shot down an injunction preventing deportations under the Alien Enemies Act," Ali explains, "it released another historic shadow docket decision. The majority of the justices chose to lift a lower court judge's injunction that had, up until Monday, prevented the federal government from removing immigrants from the U.S. to third countries, instead of their home country of origin, without at least giving them advance notice and allowing them to object on the grounds that they face torture there . The Supreme Court's intervention comes after the Trump Administration repeatedly violated U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's orders by attempting to send migrants to South Sudan, Libya, and El Salvador."
Ali continues, "The targets of this scheme argue that they will be tortured and killed if removed to these countries, making their expulsions unlawful under the Convention Against Torture and various federal laws. Murphy ruled that, at a minimum, the government must tell migrants where they are being sent, and give them an opportunity to object, with the assistance of counsel, on the grounds that they'll be tortured there."
Ali agrees with Sotomayor's dissent, arguing that the June 23 decision "shocks the conscience" because it "effectively allows the federal government to get away scot-free with defying a lower court judge's order, establishing an extraordinarily dangerous precedent."
https://www.alternet.org/scotus-trump-deportations-slate/
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

SCOTUS is allowing Trump's administration to 'defy the justice system as it pleases' (Original Post)
justaprogressive
Thursday
OP
vapor2
(2,612 posts)1. Sadists
Initech
(105,459 posts)2. They're a massive part of the problem right now. We need to deal with them.
But how?
-misanthroptimist
(1,384 posts)3. A corrupt Court enabling a corrupt, convicted felon President?
Unpossible!
Bettie
(18,497 posts)4. Yeah, wow, it's almost like the people telling us "the courts will hold"
had forgotten about the makeup of our current SCOTUS.
The courts aren't holding....they aren't entirely complicit yet, but they are moving in that direction.