Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Very Serious Question (Original Post) malaise Saturday OP
Yes. Questions have been raised if adoptions were legal. They will find a squirmy exception to any 'concerns'. cbabe Saturday #1
There's just no orphans living in the US for adoption. marble falls Saturday #2
Well within their means. Kid Berwyn Saturday #3

cbabe

(5,183 posts)
1. Yes. Questions have been raised if adoptions were legal. They will find a squirmy exception to any 'concerns'.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 02:27 PM
Saturday

Kid Berwyn

(20,996 posts)
3. Well within their means.
Sat Jun 28, 2025, 04:05 PM
Saturday

Last edited Sat Jun 28, 2025, 04:48 PM - Edit history (1)

Truly glad the Roberts adopted the kids from Ireland. However, wealthy households are rare when looking to adopt children, most of whom are Black, Hispanic and medical high-needs and psychically traumatized children in the USA. Those mostly fall on POC — especially women.



’They come to me’: Jane Roberts’ legal recruiting work involved officials whose agencies had cases before the Supreme Court

In newly revealed testimony, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts said she worked for “U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators” and more.


By HAILEY FUCHS and JOSH GERSTEIN
Politico, 01/31/2023

Jane Roberts, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts, acknowledges having represented a wide variety of public officials — including senior Justice Department officials and Cabinet members — as they transitioned to jobs in the private sector, according to testimony in an arbitration hearing to resolve a lawsuit filed by an ex-colleague against her former legal recruiting business.

A partial transcript of that testimony was included in a complaint submitted to the House, Senate and Justice Department filed in December on behalf of the former colleague.

Snip…

Jane Roberts’ placements included at least one firm with a prominent Supreme Court practice, according to the complaint, which also includes sworn testimony from Roberts herself, in which she notes the powerful officials — whose agencies have had frequent cases before her husband — for whom she has worked.

“A significant portion of my practice on the partner side is with senior government lawyers, ranging from U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators, chairmen of federal commissions, general counsel of federal commissions, and then senior political appointees within the ranks of various agencies, and I -- they come to me looking to transition to the private sector,” Roberts said, according to a transcript of a 2015 arbitration hearing related to her former colleague’s termination.

In her testimony, Roberts also noted the benefit of working with senior government officials: “Successful people have successful friends.”

Continues…

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/31/jane-roberts-legal-recruiting-work-agencies-cases-supreme-court-00080515

Used to have to be in the private sector to get all those zeroes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Very Serious Question