Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJack Smith Deposition: Full Video (no commentary)
Last edited Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Edited to add: FYI there is an earlier thread on this topic which has now had the same video added to the OP, if you want to get in on the conversation over there:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220899413
This is over eight hours long. I've watched the first 30 minutes or so and it is quite riveting. The first questioner does a pretty terrible job of trying to undermine Smith.
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Smith Deposition: Full Video (no commentary) (Original Post)
EarlG
23 hrs ago
OP
Yep. That's right out of the Republican playbook, utilized when the usual lies won't work.
FadedMullet
20 hrs ago
#14
Nictuku
(4,542 posts)1. I'm watching it now
I guess I'm a nerd.
littlemissmartypants
(31,535 posts)2. PDF transcript here:
sheshe2
(95,735 posts)3. Thanks!
Cha
(316,588 posts)4. TY EarlG!
PatSeg
(52,032 posts)5. Thank you for posting
MustLoveBeagles
(14,657 posts)6. Thanks for posting
Bookmarking.
🎉🥳
Uncle Joe
(64,156 posts)7. Smith's case relied heavily on Republicans.
Thanks for the thread EarlG
liberalla
(10,796 posts)8. Wow! I'm looking forward to this!
Thanks for posting!!!!
quaint
(4,628 posts)9. Bookmarked, TY
ancianita
(42,785 posts)10. Thank you!
LilElf70
(1,356 posts)11. Bookmarked and passed along
to everyone I know. TYTYTYTY
Ya gotta love it
KT2000
(21,928 posts)12. Questioner does not understand
the job of the prosecutor. He is relying on conspiracy theories and is not the facts of the case.
BootinUp
(50,847 posts)13. Probably intentional obfuscation. Nt
FadedMullet
(666 posts)14. Yep. That's right out of the Republican playbook, utilized when the usual lies won't work.
red dog 1
(32,418 posts)15. K&R
And shared on Bluesky
yellow dahlia
(4,393 posts)16. Thank you. Bookmarking.