Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,497 posts)
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 06:05 PM Wednesday

Blondi is tracking Congress' searches in Epstein files

Why is DOJ tracking what members of Congress are searching for in the Epstein files? bsky.app/profile/atru...

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2026-02-11T22:55:06.749Z


Why is DOJ tracking what members of Congress are searching for in the Epstein files?

CNN: "Another photograph - these are notes AG Bondi brought to the hearing today. This shows a list of Rep. Jayapal's search history. Lawmakers are allowed to go to a DOJ facility to search unredacted files. We learned from this photo that the searches are apparently being tracked & read by the DOJ"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-11T21:27:58.630Z


CNN: "Another photograph - these are notes AG Bondi brought to the hearing today. This shows a list of Rep. Jayapal's search history. Lawmakers are allowed to go to a DOJ facility to search unredacted files. We learned from this photo that the searches are apparently being tracked & read by the DOJ"

End snips





12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TommyT139

(2,266 posts)
2. I didn't watch the whole thing
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 06:13 PM
Wednesday

...but to me that was perhaps the only useful information to come out of today's session.

If nothing else, it gives the regime an excuse to file charges if anything turns up in the public press.

Wiz Imp

(9,411 posts)
9. File charges for what?
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:35 PM
Wednesday

The law requires all of the material to be released publicly. It also required the DOJ to provide explicit detailed justification for any redactions. The DOJ has not done that. That means the entire tranche of data is free reign to inform the public about.

TommyT139

(2,266 posts)
11. You'd think, right?
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 08:34 PM
Wednesday

It was a tad disappointing that one of the congressmen had an email relating to Trump, yet when Bondi said it was "privileged," he refrained from reading it, both in the hearing and then later on TV.

slightlv

(7,601 posts)
7. Isn't that what the Repugs were claiming
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:33 PM
Wednesday

when some emails were pulled from them regarding Jan 6? And it seems like there was another time Repugs emails came into interest a few years ago, but I can't remember the exact timing or reason. But, like they always do, they screamed like holy victims when it's THEIR emails. Not so much when it's anybody else's.

chowder66

(12,020 posts)
8. One of two things and maybe both....
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:33 PM
Wednesday

To get their talking points in order when Dems bring up information they have seen and/or to try to use their search terms against them which would be ridiculous but I wouldn't put it past them.

Wiz Imp

(9,411 posts)
10. I would guess most are searching for specific documents that were already identified in the redacted files
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 07:40 PM
Wednesday

The point being Democrats want to find out what was redacted and prove that 99% of the redactions were illegal and unnecessary. I would bet most searches are for simple document numbers.

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,107 posts)
12. MaddowBlog-Justice Department accused of surveilling lawmakers' Epstein files search history
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 04:52 PM
13 hrs ago

As the dust settled on the partisan circus, there was a new controversy that had nothing to do with Bondi’s antics and everything to do with her notes.

Justice Department accused of surveilling lawmakers’ Epstein files search history. As the dust settled on the partisan circus, there was a new controversy that had nothing to do with Bondi’s antics and everything to do with her notes. www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

(@jwwcan.bsky.social) 2026-02-12T16:24:12.203Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/justice-department-accused-of-surveilling-lawmakers-epstein-files-search-history

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s unusually chaotic appearance before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday was notable in large part because of what the Florida Republican said during the proceedings. But as the dust settled on the partisan circus, there was another element to the larger controversy that had nothing to do with Bondi’s antics and everything to do with her notes. CBNC reported:

Attorney General Pam Bondi at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday seemed to have a printout of Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s history of searches of the Department of Justice’s database of documents related to the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Photos of a black binder that Bondi had at the hearing showed the words ‘Jayapal Pramila Search History’ and a list of documents whose numbers coincide with the number of Epstein files.


In recent days, many members of Congress have gained access to Epstein materials that are not available to the public, though the limitations are significant. Lawmakers have to physically go to the Justice Department and review the records in a private space, without staff or recording equipment. Members have to rely on DOJ computers while being supervised by DOJ officials.

At that point, they can begin searching the documents as part of the ongoing congressional investigation.

Bondi’s notes, however, captured by a Reuters photographer, pointed to an element we weren’t aware of: The DOJ is apparently surveilling what documents among the Epstein files members are looking for.

NEW: A page from Bondi's burn book. This is a list of the searches by Rep Jayapal of the unredacted Epstein files. That means the DOJ grabbed her search terms from the computers they set up for members of congress to view the Epstein files to use as ammunition. The photo is from Reuters.

Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2026-02-11T23:36:23.833Z


Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, was not pleased.

“Not only has the Department of Justice illegally withheld documents from Congress and the American people. Not only has Attorney General Bondi failed to bring a single indictment against a single co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. But now Bondi and her team are spying on Members of Congress conducting oversight in yet another blatant attempt to intrude into Congress’s oversight processes,” the Maryland Democrat said in a statement.

Raskin added, “It is an outrage that DOJ is tracking Members’ investigative steps undertaken to ensure that DOJ is complying with the Epstein File Transparency Act and using this information for the Attorney General’s embarrassing polemical purposes. DOJ must immediately cease tracking any Members’ searches, open up the Epstein review to senior congressional staff, and publicly release all files — with all the survivors’ information, and only the survivors’ information, properly redacted — as required by federal law.”....

The Epstein files have constituted their own scandal for quite a while, but this new controversy related to the files is just getting started. Watch this space.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Blondi is tracking Congre...