General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Finds DOJ Lawyer in Contempt in Major Escalation
A federal judge in Minnesota has found a Trump administration lawyer in civil contempt of court over the treatment of an immigrant released from ICE custody.
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino has ordered Matthew Isihara, a military attorney brought in to assist Pam Bondis Justice Department as a special assistant U.S. attorney, to pay a $500 daily fine until all identification documents belonging to Rigoberto Soto Jimenez are returned to him.
The Mexican national, who has lived in Minnesota since 2018 and is a legal resident of the U.S., was detained by ICE in mid-January as part of Donald Trumps hardline mass deportation efforts. Like hundreds of other immigrants in Minnesota arrested under the administrations Operation Metro Surge, Soto Jimenez filed a lawsuit claiming his civil rights had been violated during his detention.
Provinzino ordered Soto Jimenez to be released from ICE custody last week after ruling that immigration officials had not presented a warrant that justifies his detention. The judge then set a court hearing for Wednesday to question why the government had not only failed to release Soto Jimenez in Minnesota as ordered, but had also failed to return all his documents to him.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/judge-finds-doj-lawyer-contempt-114213443.html
CanonRay
(16,057 posts)FakeNoose
(40,985 posts)Appointed by President Joe Biden ....

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Provinzino
Irish_Dem
(80,518 posts)bluestarone
(21,774 posts)cooperating with Minnesota investigations!!
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,544 posts)Judges are taking bold measures to get the Trump administration to comply with the law.
Minnesota judgeâs contempt order shows a way to force government into compliance - MS NOW apple.news/ACm-vPNtpQYq...
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-19T21:04:36.632Z
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/minnesota-judge-contempt-order-trump-administration-compliance
The answer may be to hold government officials and lawyers in contempt or at least threaten to do so.
Underscoring the dire state of the rule of law in this country, Minnesotas chief federal district judge last month set a hearing for the acting head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to explain why he shouldnt be held in contempt, after the government failed to comply with an order to provide an immigrant a bond hearing or release them from custody.
The judge, Patrick Schiltz, acknowledged that he was taking an extraordinary step in the case of Juan Hugo Tobay Robles. But he explained why he felt the need to do so: The extent of ICEs violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary, and lesser measures have been tried and failed.
Yet, the acting ICE chief, Todd Lyons, was never held in contempt. The government complied with the judges order before the hearing, thus rendering his appearance moot.....
The latest bold judicial response in Minnesota came this week, when a judge ordered a Trump government lawyer to be held in civil contempt. Such contempt is used to force compliance, whereas criminal contempt punishes violations.
The civil contempt order came in yet another immigration-related case, with U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino saying Wednesday that, starting Friday, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Isihara would have to pay $500 for each day that Rigoberto Soto Jimenez is not in possession of his identification documents. For avoidance of doubt, the coercive fine will continue until the certification of compliance is filed on the docket, the Biden-appointed judges order said.....
Later Wednesday, Paul Blume of Fox 9 in Minneapolis reported that Soto Jimenezs lawyer said the government had given her client an overnight delivery tracking number and that the lawyer believed his identification papers would arrive on Thursday, nullifying any fines.
If thats how this one ends, then it will have been another instance of the government doing what it had to do all along but only in the face of contempt consequences. That shouldnt be necessary to run a legal system, but the contempt tool is there for a reason and this administration is giving judges every reason to use it.
Ilikepurple
(520 posts)I know the Beast has to get the clicks, but I grow so tired of headlines creatively using words to titillate, obfuscate, or misdirect. A judge is not majorly escalating anything by finding an attorney in contempt to get them to comply with a court order. Obviously, Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin, its not your fault and I appreciate the link and excerpts.