Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:21 PM 10 hrs ago

Does anyone share my view that they only decided to finally pull the trigger on Prince Andrew to save the Monarchy

and NOT because of "new information"?

It is inconceivable that MI5 and MI6 were unaware of enough of his activities to invoke the United Kingdom's "Official Secrets Act":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_Act_1911

or that they did not have evidence of either/and gross sexual and financial "improprieties".

Anyone agree with my assessment? Disagree?

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone share my view that they only decided to finally pull the trigger on Prince Andrew to save the Monarchy (Original Post) artemisia1 10 hrs ago OP
The monarchy isn't in trouble. Wednesdays 10 hrs ago #1
Okay, "Protect" then. /nt artemisia1 9 hrs ago #7
which is more than a little different. - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 9 hrs ago #12
Take it outside. Both terms work. artemisia1 8 hrs ago #17
Until a majority realize the "Royal" family is a disturbing and vile anachronism. PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #16
Beg to differ. artemisia1 8 hrs ago #20
Um, what? Wednesdays 8 hrs ago #22
Both work. I was indulging you. It has been on the downslide for decades and only QE2 kept it together in the post-War artemisia1 8 hrs ago #23
it's strange that these Western countries still have royalty: UK, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands BlueWaveNeverEnd 4 hrs ago #33
Don't know about saving the royals but DURHAM D 10 hrs ago #2
The British press invented sleazy gossip "reporting". They were determined to sabotage his marriage to Meghan. That artemisia1 9 hrs ago #5
That and this is a way to get rid of Fergie. mercuryblues 10 hrs ago #3
Well shanti 6 hrs ago #30
I agree. markodochartaigh 9 hrs ago #4
Again, the monarchy will still be intact after all of it Wednesdays 9 hrs ago #9
I think that picture of him over that young girl was the end for him. Jacson6 9 hrs ago #6
Imagine being a trafficked teen girl and having that oaf on top of you. I bet that picture was the absolute tamest they artemisia1 9 hrs ago #8
Feel like this is a "take what we can get" situation TBH AZJonnie 9 hrs ago #10
I agree, they sat on the Virginia evidence for self-serving reasons. It is a shame she couldn't see him in the metal artemisia1 9 hrs ago #11
I'm not entirely sure who sat on it, or even if it was consciously sat on AZJonnie 8 hrs ago #21
Palace security security at the Royal Lodge initially didn't allow process servers to hand him the lawsuit directly, UK artemisia1 7 hrs ago #25
Law of the Mafia. When someone is out of line ... usonian 9 hrs ago #13
Not really. My opinion - the people that are stopdiggin 9 hrs ago #14
I think they scheduled out these events so Andrew Ilsa 9 hrs ago #15
Definitely nt Raine 8 hrs ago #18
No, not at all. Emrys 8 hrs ago #19
There were calls for Charles to resign Blue Full Moon 8 hrs ago #24
I gather it's a very small minority Kaleva 4 hrs ago #31
They are making a big show of taking him to task for money stuff to distract from RockRaven 7 hrs ago #26
The monarchy is taking a big hit. Irish_Dem 7 hrs ago #27
This. You stated it better than I did. artemisia1 6 hrs ago #28
AKA, No Sussexes And No Yorks (Mountbatten-Windsors?). ColoringFool 6 hrs ago #29
Is there any evidence that suggests the Monarchy is in danger? Kaleva 4 hrs ago #32
Note that the arresting force canetoad 4 hrs ago #34
I thought Thames Valley was a bit... róisín_dubh 3 hrs ago #35
Don't know the ins and outs canetoad 3 hrs ago #36
Charles, other royals and Thatcher were friends of the "admired" Jimmy Savile PufPuf23 3 hrs ago #37
Yes, good point, and those who think the Monarchy is in no danger forget how much disrepute the Savile connection artemisia1 3 hrs ago #38
I bet Harry is relieved that he bailed out of this situation. edbermac 3 hrs ago #39

Wednesdays

(22,085 posts)
1. The monarchy isn't in trouble.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:24 PM
10 hrs ago

The Brits have as much chance at abolishing the monarchy as we have in removing The Felon from the White House.

Wednesdays

(22,085 posts)
22. Um, what?
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:10 PM
8 hrs ago

You said "Okay, 'Protect" then."



Show me how the monarchy is crumbling. I'll wait.

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
23. Both work. I was indulging you. It has been on the downslide for decades and only QE2 kept it together in the post-War
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:26 PM
8 hrs ago

era. Monarchical privilege is deeply unpopular in the UK and many have thought that Charles might be the last Monarch. William's popularity, relative, at least, may keep this from being true.

Of course you'll disagree, but this is not a hill I'm willing to die on. If you are bent out of shape by an alternative view, then, by all means, take it outside...

BlueWaveNeverEnd

(13,601 posts)
33. it's strange that these Western countries still have royalty: UK, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:07 AM
4 hrs ago

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
5. The British press invented sleazy gossip "reporting". They were determined to sabotage his marriage to Meghan. That
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:31 PM
9 hrs ago

being said, Harry is, imho, sometimes his own worst enemy. Believing that does not mean that I don't acknowledge that both press and family have often treated him poorly.

He wanted to stay in the Army, iirc, but they wouldn't let him. Both he and "the Firm", or Royal Family, would have been better served had they respected his wishes and choices. He was good at it and was content there.

shanti

(21,792 posts)
30. Well
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 11:13 PM
6 hrs ago

Seeing that she was involved with Epstein, this will be good. Her daughters were profiting off of him as well

markodochartaigh

(5,294 posts)
4. I agree.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:31 PM
9 hrs ago

I would imagine that there was a degree of willful ignorance or plausible deniability. But if Randy Andy had been a chimney sweep he would have gone up in smoke decades ago without a second thought. I do wonder if there is more among the royal houses of Europe. I heard something about the Norwegian royal's adopted son. I doubt that the scandal would completely topple the English royals. Maybe the next generation would have to step up immediately and the king immediately step down. I saw a picture of Randy in the back seat of a car today and he looked like he was was very worried about being fitted for a new cravat.

Wednesdays

(22,085 posts)
9. Again, the monarchy will still be intact after all of it
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:39 PM
9 hrs ago

Unless new information comes out implicating Charles directly, we won't have a King William anytime soon.

Jacson6

(1,860 posts)
6. I think that picture of him over that young girl was the end for him.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:32 PM
9 hrs ago

Charles may have not told the crown to prosecute him, but he probably nodded his head when it was discussed.

Andrew is the very definition of a dirty, old man.

Sheesh!

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
8. Imagine being a trafficked teen girl and having that oaf on top of you. I bet that picture was the absolute tamest they
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:39 PM
9 hrs ago

could find of him to release.

AZJonnie

(3,353 posts)
10. Feel like this is a "take what we can get" situation TBH
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:41 PM
9 hrs ago

Given the 20+ year interim w/o charges related to Virginia, it's reasonable to assume there never would be. Just the messenger here, nobody shoot me

Thus, it would be GREAT poetic justice if the asshole paid a stiff criminal penalty directly due to other illegal shit he did around Epstein, that was eventually unearthed in his correspondences.

That'd be a pretty decent outcome, given I thought he'd never pay any price.

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
11. I agree, they sat on the Virginia evidence for self-serving reasons. It is a shame she couldn't see him in the metal
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 07:45 PM
9 hrs ago

bracelets. At least some slight justice may be administered and I agree we should take this gratefully.

AZJonnie

(3,353 posts)
21. I'm not entirely sure who sat on it, or even if it was consciously sat on
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:07 PM
8 hrs ago

But the most diplomatically correct storyline is probably that the FBI "missed it" because they were focused on the sex crime aspect, plus it was not a US security breach, so I expect that'll be the spiel. No telling how long the UK has had it, but I bet they had it before they stripped Andrew of title, and that move was part of the overall prosecution

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
25. Palace security security at the Royal Lodge initially didn't allow process servers to hand him the lawsuit directly, UK
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:32 PM
7 hrs ago

courts didn't require him to be deposed in the Giuffre case and it was made clear to Giuffre's lawyers that getting such an order would be difficult to impossible given his stature, and, finally, UK intelligence HAD to know how dirty Andrew was, including likely chargeable offences.

usonian

(24,335 posts)
13. Law of the Mafia. When someone is out of line ...
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 08:16 PM
9 hrs ago

redacted scene from Goodfellas.

An earlier post said that Melania is moving out.
I suspect that Putin is ready to turn his puppet into firewood.
And let her know to get safely away.


From Russia, with Love.

stopdiggin

(15,248 posts)
14. Not really. My opinion - the people that are
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 08:24 PM
9 hrs ago

ardent opponents of 'the family ' - have uniformly despised them, for a whole variety of reasons, for a long, long time. Yeah?

I doubt very seriously if this has really changed a lot of minds, regarding the royal family in general.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ilsa

(64,109 posts)
15. I think they scheduled out these events so Andrew
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 08:27 PM
9 hrs ago

would no longer be a prince when they arrested him.

Emrys

(9,013 posts)
19. No, not at all.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:02 PM
8 hrs ago

Andrew no longer being technically a royal certainly doesn't hurt efforts to investigate, but all this has been bubbling under in the UK press for quite some time, and the dam was bound to burst eventually.

RockRaven

(19,008 posts)
26. They are making a big show of taking him to task for money stuff to distract from
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:41 PM
7 hrs ago

the royals' and the governments' knowledge and complicity in the pedo stuff.

Since he can't be salvaged, and isn't worth saving anyway, they will flood the zone with money scandal details to dilute and distract.

Irish_Dem

(80,518 posts)
27. The monarchy is taking a big hit.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 09:45 PM
7 hrs ago

Charles and William are worried.

William is more in touch with reality and he is very worried.

He wants to clean house and downsize the monarchy.
Small group of trustworthy royals.

ColoringFool

(488 posts)
29. AKA, No Sussexes And No Yorks (Mountbatten-Windsors?).
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 11:07 PM
6 hrs ago

Only the Heir Apparent and family; Princess Anne and family; and Prince Edward and family (Sophie is known to be very loyal and hard-working).

Kaleva

(40,294 posts)
32. Is there any evidence that suggests the Monarchy is in danger?
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:04 AM
4 hrs ago

According to polls, King Charles III is popular with a majority of Brits.

canetoad

(20,526 posts)
34. Note that the arresting force
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:15 AM
4 hrs ago

Was Thames Valley Police (yeah, same as Inspector Morse). Not the Met - he's not on their turf. Not MI5 which may or may not be interested nor MI6 who's brief is to deal with matters in other than the UK.

This may very well be an unusual but otherwise fairly standard type of prosecution that just happens to be of a member of the RF. I can't see anyone invoking the Official Secrets Act - it's a pretty fair assumption that the Firm will want this played out in public.

róisín_dubh

(12,286 posts)
35. I thought Thames Valley was a bit...
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:30 AM
3 hrs ago

weird, given he lives in Norfolk.
But hey ho, glad it finally happened regardless of jurisdiction.

canetoad

(20,526 posts)
36. Don't know the ins and outs
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:40 AM
3 hrs ago

But he lived in Windsor at time of crime. Norfolk Constabulary is about half the size of Thames Valley. Could just be a decision to let a bigger force handle it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norfolk_Constabulary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Valley_Police

PS Maybe they're going to make a police procedural TV series about it.

artemisia1

(1,654 posts)
38. Yes, good point, and those who think the Monarchy is in no danger forget how much disrepute the Savile connection
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:58 AM
3 hrs ago

attached to the Royal Family.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone share my view...