Student Cheating Is Becoming Impossible to Detect in an A.I. Era

[highplainsdem]

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/18/us/ai-apps-students-cheat.html

-snip-

These kinds of tutorials are now pervasive on TikTok and YouTube. They show students how to use tools known as humanizers and autotypers, which make it easier than ever to cheat. The videos — sometimes labeled ads, sometimes not — target college and high school students.

Humanizers rewrite A.I.-produced text to make it sound less robotic, formulaic and trite.

Autotypers slowly drip words and sentences into documents, making it appear as if papers were typed at a human pace when in fact, they were produced by A.I. They even fabricate typos, deletions and revisions.

-snip-

Duey.ai, an app that describes itself as the “#1 autotyper for Google docs,” tells customers that when they’re too tired or busy to focus, or out with friends, “The document looks like you wrote it.”

-snip-

The autotypers are to let students cheat even when teachers are checking Google Docs history to see when a paper was supposedly typed, edited, etc.

The article has a lot about how Grammarly is now helping students cheat, too, since it lets students generate text, paraphrase anything they copy in, humanize text, and scan and replace writing that could set off AI detectors.

And they quote Jenny Maxwell - head of education at Superhuman, which owns Grammarly - saying this is "a huge pedagogical upheaval in education" and it's a "burn it down moment." They also say Maxwell suggested that not letting students use AI would be educational malpractice. Maxwell wants teachers to accept that most writing in the future will be done using AI.

This is all of course incredibly harmful to students. A parody of education.

[dalton99a]

1. Kick

Colleges and K-12 schools are trying to keep up, with A.I. detection becoming a significant expense. But educators attempting to restrict the technology, worried about students failing to develop basic skills, are often lagging in what tech-industry leaders are calling a detection arms race.

In some cases, the very same companies selling detection tools are also making apps that allow students to cheat, including by writing papers for them or rephrasing text written by others. The apps promise to help them avoid accusations of misconduct by scanning their work before they submit it, allowing them to rewrite passages identified as A.I. Even honest students are often willing to fork over $10 to $20 per month for premium tools, since A.I. detectors sometimes flag legitimate work.

About two-thirds of American students are using A.I. regularly for schoolwork, according to recent surveys. While only a small slice — about 9 percent — admitted to outright cheating in one large study, much A.I. use lies in an ethical gray area.

A recent College Board survey of professors found three-quarters reported their students were using A.I. to write, and over 90 percent of respondents were concerned about plagiarism and dishonesty. Many institutions have seen a sharp increase in student disciplinary cases for academic misconduct, much of it related to the use of A.I.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini are the most popular A.I. tools among students.

[eppur_se_muova]

4. I've never relied on essay papers. Never felt they were needed, or even helpful.

Of course, I teach in the physical sciences, so students' opinions don't mean much without experimental evidence behind them -- so I don't ask for opinions.

[GenThePerservering]

6. That's irrelevant, though, in areas where expository papers are necessary

[msongs]

2. blue book exams? well younguns cant writer anymore either lol

[patphil]

3. More verbal exams?

Verbal Q & A sessions with teachers may be needed.

[carpetbagger]

8. Bingo.

That's how i did it with medical students and fellows. Favouritism is always an issue, and at my level the whole thing was pass-fail anyway, but it's the only viable way at this point, although it is unfortunately labour intensive.

[Disaffected]

9. And why not written exams?

Write an essay in the exam room w/o any electronic assistance and certainly no internet access. AI, plagiarism etc. become a non-issue under such conditions.

[DFW]

5. Exactly right. Students are, long term, harmed worse than anyone

I’d hate to be a university president right about now.

With AI in academics, you can’t permit it, and you can’t prevent it. That doesn’t leave a lot of options when your goal is to educate real, live people.

I hope the day is far off when Max Headroom not only gets a degree in English Literature from Harvard, but also shows up in person to reveive his diploma.

[GenThePerservering]

7. A third of my degree rested on in-classroom debate

I had to state my position and hold it (Jesuit university - Jesuits are notoriously argumentative and can talk your arm off and then explain away its existence). It was impossible to fake that. I agree with upthread - it may be the way forward.

[no_hypocrisy]

10. Unfair to those students who put in the time for research, drafts, re-writes, and

submission.

Hopefully, the students using AI will be busted when they f**k up on footnotes and bibliography.