Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hookaleft

(1,562 posts)
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 02:11 PM 7 hrs ago

From Marc Elias: RE: Thursday Night

I received this in my email this morning:

The media has one job Thursday night: Tell the truth about Trump's lies

Donald Trump is a stone-cold liar. He lies about his height, his wealth and his golf game. He lies about his accomplishments and his failures. He lies about everything, large and small, important and insignificant.

There is nothing, however, that Donald Trump lies about more than elections — particularly, the 2020 election. There is a reason his statements about the 2020 election were dubbed the Big Lie.

In his second term, Trump has transformed the executive branch into a factory for creating, disseminating and enforcing these lies. His Cabinet is filled with election deniers who parrot his falsehoods. He insists that every nominee — whether to an agency post or a federal judgeship — offer an answer about the result of the 2020 election that reinforces the lie.

The result, as the Soviet dissident Alexander Solzhenitsyn said of the Soviet Union, is that "In our country the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State."

The difference between the former Soviet Union and the United States today is that we have the constitutional right to speak freely and criticize our government. Our media is protected from government censorship by a robust First Amendment.

But these rights are only as strong as we are willing to exercise them. Sadly, right now, too few people in positions of power are willing to loudly criticize Trump for his lies. Even worse, the once-proud legacy media has proven itself too timid to speak clearly about Trump and his lies.

But on Thursday night, the media and its powerful backers have a chance to partially redeem themselves. That is because Donald Trump has announced a prime-time speech to the nation. According to reports, he will use this time to once again lie about elections.

Specifically, he is reportedly set to announce that he has new intelligence reports supporting his lies about the 2020 election. Some suggest he may single out Georgia, while others suggest he will try to implicate multiple states' election results.

What is important to keep in mind is that it will all be lies.

To be clear, everyone in the legacy media knows Trump's history and knows that he will spread dangerous lies on Thursday night. They also know that they have a choice about whether to cover the speech in whole, in part or not at all. Most importantly, they know the danger and the stakes.

In 2014, the Obama White House sounded out the networks about carrying a prime-time address on immigration and was told no. In 2022, the networks refused prime-time coverage of a speech Joe Biden delivered on democracy.

The question we must all put to these same networks today is this: Do they plan to provide valuable free airtime to a president who is going to systematically undermine democracy by lying about elections?

Sadly, I suspect we know the answer. The largest media outlets have already proved unwilling to stand up to Trump. Their corporate overlords and outside business interests drive them to curry favor with Trump rather than hold him to account.

Some of them will no doubt cloak their decision to cover the address as important for the public to hear. While I disagree, I offer them a compromise solution: Label the entire speech with a prominent disclaimer: "Trump Is Lying to the American People."

That disclaimer should appear on screen whenever footage is shown. It — or words to the same effect — belongs in the headline and lede of any written story. It can be read aloud on podcasts and radio broadcasts.

Some will object that this is unfair, that no outlet would agree to editorialize so openly while covering a sitting president. However, neutrality is not the same thing as silence. A decision to carry a speech the media knows is false isn't neutral — it's complicit.

We have seen what happens when Trump lies about elections. On Jan. 6, 2021, thousands of Americans stormed the Capitol because they believed Trump’s lies. They believe what Trump told them, night after night, from podiums much like the one he will stand behind Thursday.

Trump could not spread these lies alone. Media outlets that knew better broadcast, quoted and printed his lies with too little context and correction. The results were deadly.

We are again watching this same situation play out in front of us. But the institutional media has a chance to learn from its failures and serve democracy and the public better.

History will not be kind to those who platformed falsehoods they knew were dangerous and called it balance. Journalism was built on a promise to inform the public, not to launder lies into the appearance of legitimate debate. Thursday night will test whether that promise still means anything.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ancianita

(43,457 posts)
4. Marc Elias and everyone else should watch CNN's and PBS's News tv & digital outlets.
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 03:20 PM
5 hrs ago

Major television networks and digital outlets such as CNN and PBS News will live fact-check Donald Trump's Thursday evening speech across their platforms.

Leading up to his 9:00 p.m. ET address, these organizations are deploying on-screen overlays and updating live digital articles to verify the claims made during his remarks on elections.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

relogic

(443 posts)
6. I must object
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 03:33 PM
5 hrs ago

Last edited Tue Jul 14, 2026, 05:19 PM - Edit history (1)

to Marc’s statement:
“The difference between the former Soviet Union and the United States today is that we have the constitutional right to speak freely and criticize our government. Our media is protected from government censorship by a robust First Amendment.”

No, we have a Justice Department committed to tracking down incorrect speech (emails criticizing ICE’s murderers) just recently. Are we certain no one disappeared has already fallen into trumps’s dungeon? I’m not seeing that “robust First Amendment.

When did Elias (I’m a fan) write that. In 1776?
I’ll definitively add: echoed in the legal maxim: "A right without a remedy is no right at all."

wnylib

(27,070 posts)
10. The rest of Elias' statement on the 1st amendment
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 04:45 PM
4 hrs ago

indicates his awareness of the problem Trump poses for free speech. He says that we must use it to push back.

Use it or lose it. (My words, not his, but I think that is his pont.)

TommyT139

(2,589 posts)
11. We do have that right.
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 04:50 PM
4 hrs ago

The DOJ's persecutions are illegal. The Amendment itself is robust, however costly its defenses might be.

"When did Elias write that. In 1776?"

If he had, he would've been psychic. The amendments were introduced June 8, 1789, and it wasn't until December 15, 1791 that three-quarters of the states had ratified the ones we now know as the Bill of Rights.

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights/how-did-it-happen

Janbdwl72

(341 posts)
7. Remember, the Presidential election is based on electoral votes
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 03:38 PM
5 hrs ago

And Biden received over 300 electoral votes. Even if Georgia's 16 are taken away, Biden still wins.

Biden did still win Georgia, of course.

So to me, the Felon is wasting everyone's time, including his own, with his silly, useless speech on Thursday.

relogic

(443 posts)
13. Amendments
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 05:15 PM
4 hrs ago

wether enshrined in 1786 or thereafter. Those “rights” are subjected to the whims of despots. “ - such as echoed in the legal maxim: "A right without a remedy is no right at all."

Gymbo

(197 posts)
16. I absolutely expect to be disappointed.
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 06:04 PM
3 hrs ago

Marc Elias is right. The media has a duty to inform honestly and correctly, what is said to the electorate. It won't happen, it will be exactly like last time when it was necessary for the media to be honest. This time however, the line is drawn, and it is time to step up and and loudly proclaim the facts.
You do that by writing letters to the editor, by picketing news outlets for their lack of veracity and public duty. You do that by phoning any outlet that will listen, You do that by going after the people who remain silent. If the silence comes from the left, pull their donations, find someone to replace them, Now is the time to rise up and be heard. Anyone who will not stand behind that should simply sit down and shut up. Demand proof, not engineered proof, demand the truth from Trump and his sycophants. Put Trump on the offensive, put the onus on him to tell the truth, because once the truth is told everything that comes after it will be dead silence. There will be nothing left for him to do but watch. The time is now, not 2028. We are where we are because the people who need to stand up won't. This is the biggest reason why Democrats are angry. Let your anger be heard startung Thursday.

11 Bravo

(24,392 posts)
17. The damned media will simply report that there is "no evidence" of Trump's claims.
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 06:12 PM
3 hrs ago

What they won't do is to call him what he is ... an insane, lying mother-fucker.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From Marc Elias: RE: Thur...