Iran reportedly moves to close Strait of Hormuz after US attacks
Source: The Hill
This file photo from around 1980 shows the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial 20-mile-wide sea link between the Persian Gulf oil-exporting nations and shipping lanes to oil-importing nations.
The Iranian Parliament has approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint, after the United States bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, according to the Iranian state media on Sunday.
While the Parliament has voted in favor of closing the strait, the final decision rests with the countrys Supreme National Security Council, according to state media.
Closing the strait, located between Iran and Oman, could have serious implications for both the global and U.S. economy.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5362973-iran-approves-closing-strait-of-hormuz/
Link to tweet

Bernardo de La Paz
(56,573 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(165,133 posts)Link to tweet

Bernardo de La Paz
(56,573 posts)ShazzieB
(20,967 posts)I don't think it's incorrect to say the Parliament "moved" to block the Strait.That just means they made their decision, which the countrys Supreme National Security Council will decide whether to implement.
Bernardo de La Paz
(56,573 posts)ShazzieB
(20,967 posts)I blame the headline writer at The Hill, which the op was quoting. I think the limits of the Parliament's power are pretty clear in the text of the article. Headlines are often thrown together in a hurry, usually by someone other that the author of the peace. I've seen bloopers like this before, where a headline appeared to have been constructed by someone without a full understanding of an article's content.
In the Latest Breaking News forum, we are told to use the title exactly as it appears in the piece, so the inacuurate headline got perpetuated in the post's title. Unfortunate, but anyone who read the whole post would get a more nuanced view.
Irish_Dem
(71,332 posts)ananda
(32,345 posts)Leaving no stone unturned to make sure
American citizens are totally screwed.
LetMyPeopleVote
(165,133 posts)Bengus81
(8,911 posts)We're already at $3.00 in Wichita as of a couple of days ago. Let the GOUGING begin.
FirstLight
(15,336 posts)it's $6 here in Nor Cal... ugh
bronxiteforever
(10,511 posts)Mosby
(18,699 posts)How do you suppose they will accomplish this exactly? With what Navy?
Good grief.
purple_haze
(127 posts)participated in yesterday's festivities. We can keep the strait open as much as we want.
BUT.... once again.... here comes the escalation.
EX500rider
(11,905 posts)
manicdem
(527 posts)Iran has anti-ship missiles launched from land. They'll get intercepted and launchers destroyed.
I wonder what Iraq will do if they can't sell oil or if one of their ships get hit. Iraq's been cozying up to the Iranians.
True Dough
(23,397 posts)Will help ensure safe passage for oil tankers.
EX500rider
(11,905 posts)DarthDem
(5,395 posts)LINO. Legislature in . . . well, you know the rest.
we can do it
(12,905 posts)ShazzieB
(20,967 posts)Posting links to X is still allowed under the DU TOS. As long as it's not against the rules, I don't think any of us has standing to tell people not to post them (much as we might prefer not to see them here).
If you feel those links should be banned. I suggest raising the issue with the site administrators. It's been discussed in the fairly recent past, but no action was taken at the time. Imo, it never hurts to revisit an issue like this from time, in case the tide of opinion has changed.
Mysterian
(5,718 posts)and fix everything!
blue-wave
(4,697 posts)in the manufacture of drones? We might want to ask a few Ukrainians about this.