Supreme Court allows Trump to restart swift deportation of migrants away from their home countries
Last edited Mon Jun 23, 2025, 06:49 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: AP
Updated 6:28 PM EDT, June 23, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.
The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices joined a scathing dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The court action came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan, though they later diverted to an American naval base in Djibouti after a judge stepped in.
The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. Immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trumps administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.
In her 19-page dissent, Sotomayor wrote that the courts action exposes thousands to the risk of torture or death and gives the Trump administration a win despite earlier violating the lower courts order.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immigration-trump-south-sudan-c7ffbbcede3158a3352b2dbf4439780a
Just breaking. Short article at original post time.
Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf
Article updated.
Previous articles -
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.
The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented. It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan, though they later diverted to a U.S. naval base in Djibouti after a judge stepped in.
The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. Immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump's administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.
In a scathing 19-page dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court's action exposes "thousands to the risk of torture or death."
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations. The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented from the order.
It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found that violated his court order giving people a chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent away from their home countries.
The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries.
After Murphy stepped in, authorities landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.
The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented from the order.
It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found that violated his court order giving people a chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent away from their home countries.
The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. Authorities instead landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.
Original article -
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands on Monday, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.
The high court's action came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May, a move that U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found violated his order. The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries.
Authorities instead landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.
The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump's administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.

Karasu
(1,516 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 23, 2025, 08:04 PM - Edit history (2)
their homelands. Not to fucking war zones or mega-prisons in motherfucking El Salvador.
There is no defense for this.
So much for all the bullshit about "sending them back." You're not sending them back, you're just sending them AWAY...to live and die in some of the worst fucking places on Earth for no fucking reason.
littlemissmartypants
(28,320 posts)They left home to avoid murder, maybe don't send them back there.
The order still stinks to high heaven though.
Karasu
(1,516 posts)littlemissmartypants
(28,320 posts)Led by President Psychopath, would definitely send them to their home country to be murdered.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,352 posts)Karasu
(1,516 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,352 posts)
twodogsbarking
(14,214 posts)littlemissmartypants
(28,320 posts)Those hats hide the gaping holes where their brains fell out. If they ever had brains from the start.
JoseBalow
(7,781 posts)Even a child can recognize how unjust that is.
kacekwl
(8,421 posts)Supreme Court. Freshman law students could do the job better. How can justice be served with this court ?
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #4)
Marthe48 This message was self-deleted by its author.
FBaggins
(28,205 posts)Solly Mack
(95,189 posts)Ponietz
(3,952 posts)fujiyamasan
(349 posts)The SC is green lighting the worst of the administrations fascist actions.
We are truly fucked. If the administration can just send non citizens to some random country with no accountability, its just a matter of time before protections for citizens are chipped away.
slightlv
(5,949 posts)ask some of the american citizens who have been kidnapped off city streets... or the okays by state governments to run down protestors with cars, or open fire on them if they so desire. Our right to freedom of speech has been squashed since trump got into office the first time. How many of us here feel comfortable and okay with green lighting progressive speech in public... even if it's just standing up for human rights or a single human currently being put under duress? And we already see the media has melted into a cesspool of non-1st amendment persuasions.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,352 posts)North Coast Lawyer
(120 posts)America is no longer governed by the rule of law. We are now an autocracy were people can be kidnapped and disappeared. We're no better than Chile or Argentina in the 1970s and 1980s.
We're now the world's largest "shit hole country".
slightlv
(5,949 posts)travelingthrulife
(2,801 posts)Polybius
(20,399 posts)I can't find it in the article.
BumRushDaShow
(155,596 posts)With Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissenting.
mountain grammy
(27,935 posts)condemning so many innocent people to misery and probably death. Shameful..
Bayard
(25,781 posts)Save the plane fare. Anybody really think people from these 3 countries will survive long in South Sudan?
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Bayard This message was self-deleted by its author.
58Sunliner
(5,830 posts)Picaro
(2,073 posts)Utterly disgusting.
The SC has historically delivered the opposite of justice based on sound legal reasoning.
This court conforms to the historic pattern.
LudwigPastorius
(12,821 posts)They're just a jump, skip, and a step away from OKing concentration camps.
Initech
(105,459 posts)
littlemissmartypants
(28,320 posts)perdita9
(1,274 posts)They kill too many people
bernieb
(93 posts)Has opened the door to ending due process.
somsai
(116 posts)is part of this pressure for countries to take back their citizens.
A buddy was picked up at his home Friday morning. Born in a refugee camp in Tland so he has citizenship in no country. Sold over 24 grams of coke 15 years ago, felony. Spent a year in prison, and a year in immigration prison. He was changed when he got out. Spent all his time working or with his wife and two young at that time kids. Now he is paying for a 4 bedroom and supporting his elderly parents and parents in law. Four seniors in their mid to late 70s. He's an independent mechanic and makes good money.
People come here as infants and don't realize how important it is to become a citizen.
republianmushroom
(20,448 posts)bluestarone
(19,918 posts)THEY have made the decision to help TSF DESTROY our country.