Supreme Court Rules States Can Block Medicaid Patients From Accessing Planned Parenthood
Source: HuffPost
The Supreme Court effectively ruled on Thursday morning that South Carolina can exclude Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs because the national health care organization also offers abortion care. The decision will deny hundreds of thousands of low-income patients their only health care option and paves a path for other states to do the same.
Its the high courts first ruling on abortion since the return of President Donald Trump, whose administration in February joined the case alongside South Carolina. The decision is a win for the Trump administration, which has made it a priority to actualize the GOPs long-held goal of defunding Planned Parenthood.
The 6-3 ruling in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic focused on the technical question of whether Medicaid-covered patients could sue in order to claim the right to use Planned Parenthood as a health care provider. Federal Medicaid rules allow patients to access care from any provider who is both qualified to provide the care and willing to provide the care, a provision known as free choice of provider.
Now, the court has ruled, South Carolinas Medicaid recipients do not have the right to sue a state if it terminates their chosen provider from the Medicaid program for reasons unrelated to competence, opening the door for providers to be barred from the program for political reasons.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supreme-court-rules-that-states-can-block-medicaid-patients-from-accessing-planned-parenthood_n_6841a12ae4b00b2e94c614d7

bucolic_frolic
(51,516 posts)They are not even considering alternatives to their rigid religious zealot mindset.
BumRushDaShow
(156,885 posts)Hekate
(98,596 posts)
and access to screening for cancer and STDs will be be cut off as well. Just because Planned Parenthood also provides abortions.
Once again, the message is clear: die, you sluts.
NotHardly
(2,133 posts)Farmer-Rick
(11,875 posts)I would take a short vacation to: California, Alaska, Delaware, Colorado, DC, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Main, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington or Wyoming.
All the above states and districts allow abortion up to fetal viability, the former standard for the entire US.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,087 posts)totodeinhere
(13,640 posts)cards.
Oeditpus Rex
(42,113 posts)Please tell us you're being sarcastic.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,087 posts)Farmer-Rick
(11,875 posts)Just moving to a safe state would be expensive, let alone taking a trip. It would have to be a long term project. Hopefully they live within a car drive to a safe state.
Yeah, women in red, unsafe states are f*cked even before they have sex.
maxsolomon
(36,918 posts)This ruling effectively shuts down PP in SC. And every other Anti-Choice State.
quaint
(3,962 posts)Just shaking my head now, wondering at the elitism.
Oeditpus Rex
(42,113 posts)Especially to those on Medicaid.
mainer
(12,375 posts)There's already a shortage of doctors there. So where are women now supposed to go for prenatal or GYN care?
Women, flee those red states! Bring your sisters and your daughters! Leave those states to the incels (who'll now have an even harder time finding women to date).
rawhideal
(65 posts)Will be first to cut PP.
mahatmakanejeeves
(65,708 posts)Reposted by Kevin M. Kruse
@mikesacks.bsky.social
Follow
The Roberts Court, in one fell swoop, has:
1) Allowed states to defund Planned Parenthood even for non-abortion care so to...
2) Rip away people's right to choose their care provider under Medicaid while...
3) Advancing a neoconfederate understanding of our civil rights laws.
This can't go on.
Mike Sacks
@mikesacks.bsky.social
· 2h
KBJ's Medina dissent highlights the twin prongs of the pro-democracy vision she's been articulating since joining SCOTUS: generally deferring to Congress's will and specifically reading Reconstruction-era civil rights laws as robustly as their framers intended: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
June 26, 2025 at 11:07 AM
The Roberts Court, in one fell swoop, has:
— Mike Sacks (@mikesacks.bsky.social) 2025-06-26T15:07:40.763Z
1) Allowed states to defund Planned Parenthood even for non-abortion care so to...
2) Rip away people's right to choose their care provider under Medicaid while...
3) Advancing a neoconfederate understanding of our civil rights laws.
This can't go on.
raccoon
(31,952 posts)You might want to rethink that.
Faux pas
(15,800 posts)

FBaggins
(28,257 posts)The state can't block people from accessing PP... but they can (according to this ruling) refuse to pay for any services there.
Oeditpus Rex
(42,113 posts)filed a countersuit. If not, they will damned soon.
The Felon has to go. I don't care where or how.
FBaggins
(28,257 posts)There's no undoing the decision except by winning elections in SC and changing the policy - or electing several new Democratic senators and a new president and changing SCOTUS.
Polybius
(20,550 posts)Agree with you, and wouid like to add that the only other way this could be overturned is with a constitutional amendment.
Jit423
(1,568 posts)miscarriage and female health issues other then birth control. I am just crying now because it appears that Trump and all his followers just want poor and non-white women to suffer and die.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(126,168 posts)and be more susceptible to cervical cancer. Brilliant!!!