Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,317 posts)
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 05:12 PM Jul 11

Judge rules Los Angeles police can't use nonlethal weapons against journalists

Source: Politico

07/11/2025 01:46 PM EDT
Updated: 07/11/2025 04:25 PM EDT


A federal judge ruled Los Angeles police cannot force journalists out of protest areas or use nonlethal weapons against them after reporters alleged officers targeted them during anti-ICE demonstrations last month.

U.S. District Judge Hernán D. Vera granted the Los Angeles Press Club’s request for a 14-day restraining order against the city’s police department after the group said it documented dozens of incidents in which officers forced reporters away from public spaces where protests were taking place, hit them with rubber bullets and nonlethal weapons and exposed them to tear gas.

Vera’s ruling is an emergency order giving the court more time to consider whether to grant a longer-term block. It prohibits Los Angeles police from keeping journalists out of closed areas, assaulting or obstructing those in the process of news gathering, arresting those in closed areas and using nonlethal weapons against reporters.

“When journalists persisted in documenting the protests, it appears from the evidence presented that they faced an onslaught of projectiles and other shows of physical force,” Vera’s ruling said. “On some occasions, LAPD officers purportedly targeted individuals who were clearly identifiable as members of the press.”

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/11/lapd-weapons-journalists-00448476



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.974511/gov.uscourts.cacd.974511.44.0.pdf

REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143483223
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Faux pas

(15,812 posts)
20. That was my first thought
Sat Jul 12, 2025, 02:31 PM
Jul 12

and you know all the magat "law" enforcement assholes well take it that way.

TomSlick

(12,623 posts)
10. If an officer or agency can be identified, they can be jailed for contempt.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 07:46 PM
Jul 11

The problem is that LLMs don't come with names of the shooter.

TomSlick

(12,623 posts)
13. The order is against the LAPD - not the ICEstappo.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 10:01 PM
Jul 11

I find it odd that the LAPD chief didn't put a stop to this without a court order.

Irish_Dem

(72,738 posts)
14. Duh thanks Tom. I wrongly assumed we were talking about ICE.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 10:03 PM
Jul 11

We can well ask ourselves why the local police in more that one jurisdiction have not
challenged ICE. And in some cases, helped them carry out illegal activities.

TomSlick

(12,623 posts)
15. No worries. You made a reasonable assumption.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 10:17 PM
Jul 11

It is unbelievable that the LOS ANGLES police are doing this.

Irish_Dem

(72,738 posts)
16. Yes they know it is against the law, rules, constitution?
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 10:21 PM
Jul 11

It is assault. Attempted murder.

Perhaps they get caught up in ICE brutality and ruthlessness.

Like in the Stanford Prison Experiments.
People descend into brutality and violence quickly when those around them are doing it
and condoning it.

Yes but where the hell is the supervision? What are the higher ranking police officers
and captain?

tonkatoy8888

(130 posts)
3. Do we really
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 05:37 PM
Jul 11

live in a country where it takes a court order to stop a major metropolitan police department from shooting reporters with rubber bullets and gassing them?

I guess we do.

Silly me, I assumed every police officer in the US was given a heads up about protected speech.

Guess not.

Almost proves my contention that there is hardly any situation that the insertion of police doesn't make said situation worse.

Buddyzbuddy

(1,240 posts)
7. It shouldn't take a court order. Where in the hell is the Chief?
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 06:57 PM
Jul 11

He's either complicit in allowing the force to use such tactics against the press and legal protests or he's too weak for them to listen to him. Either way he needs to issue new orders or start looking for another job.

Marthe48

(21,377 posts)
8. The biggest shock is that this is a report from the U.S.A.
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 07:01 PM
Jul 11

My own country, where I thought I wouldn't live to see the day.

BumRushDaShow

(157,317 posts)
9. This kind of thing happened during the BLM protests
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 07:28 PM
Jul 11

along with the use of tear gas, flash bangs, pepper spray, and yes, even rubber bullets.

But because that happened during the pandemic, there was that "pandemic overlay".

Marthe48

(21,377 posts)
12. I don't support the cops or thugs in these situations
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 09:24 PM
Jul 11

They get savage faster than the crowds do.

Passages

(3,383 posts)
18. Score 1 for the pathetic USA. You can see how they're enjoying being fascists thugs.
Sat Jul 12, 2025, 08:24 AM
Jul 12
“On some occasions, LAPD officers purportedly targeted individuals who were clearly identifiable as members of the press.”
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rules Los Angeles p...