'Very chilling': GOP senators slam Trump admin's bungled indictment attempt against Dems
Source: Raw Story
February 11, 2026 7:46PM ET
With President Donald Trump's Justice Department trying, and failing, to secure a criminal indictment against Sens. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) for their roles in a video advising active-duty troops they must refuse illegal orders, Senate Republicans are coming out of the woodwork to condemn the administration having even attempted this in the first place, NOTUS reported on Wednesday evening.
Its very chilling, right? As a member of Congress, we have the Speech and Debate Clause. Not only as a member, but its a First Amendment right of speech here, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), a frequent critic of the president, told NOTUS.
Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who faces a tough re-election battle this fall, said, Im not surprised that the grand jury declined to indict them, said Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME). I dont think they should have [tried to indict them]. I spoke out about that very early on.
Meanwhile, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA), who faces a primary challenge backed by Trump, said, I would not have brought it were I the president. Even some Republican lawmakers who are more loyal to Trump, and who agreed with his fury over the Democratic video, expressed similar opinions. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told NOTUS, [the video showed] terrible, terrible judgment, but I think trying to indict them for it was not a good idea.
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/senate-gop-2675261016/
OldBaldy1701E
(10,719 posts)Nor do we care about said attempts.
yardwork
(69,122 posts)tableturner
(1,831 posts)radical noodle
(10,514 posts)It was terrible judgment for them to anger our King.
Bluetus
(2,510 posts)I don't know if the OP thought that any of this reflected even a tiny sliver of courage by the Republicans. It just makes them look worse.
All of those statements were of the form, "they probably deserved to be in prison, but it was bad optics to seek the indictments." Only Murkowski even mentioned it was a fundamental right. None of them came within light-years of simply saying "The Senators are correct. Nobody should be following illegal or unconstitutional orders."
efhmc
(16,274 posts)Exp
(830 posts)ruet
(10,201 posts)I think I might have an inaccurate understanding of the definition of that word.
BumRushDaShow
(167,377 posts)any actual criticism is a slam.
Akakoji
(497 posts)Liars. Frauds. Losers
