Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,772 posts)
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 06:20 AM 7 hrs ago

Navarro: Democratic president may use 'selective' FCC enforcement against talk radio

Source: The Hill

02/19/26 6:24 PM ET


TV host Ana Navarro warned there could be repercussions for Republican radio programs after controversy surrounding a CBS interview with a Democratic candidate from Texas.

Stephen Colbert accused the network of blocking “The Late Show” from airing his conversation with Texas state Rep. James Talarico (D), saying CBS would only allow the show to post the segment on YouTube. The network has denied Colbert’s claims.

“The Late Show was not prohibited by CBS from broadcasting the interview with Rep. James Talarico,” a spokesperson for the network said. “The show was provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett [D-Texas], and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled.” Talarico is running against Crockett in the Texas Democratic Senate primary.

During a Wednesday evening panel of CNN’s “NewsNight,” Navarro, the co-host of “The View,” called the FCC’s rule “outdated” and accused the administration of “selective” application. “Well, you know what? There may be a president in the next term who decides that he wants to, or she wants to, apply it to talk radio, and let’s see how Republicans like that,” Navarro said.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5746555-cbs-blocks-colbert-interview/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Navarro: Democratic president may use 'selective' FCC enforcement against talk radio (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago OP
In my wildest dreams. RandySF 7 hrs ago #1
You and me both! BumRushDaShow 6 hrs ago #2
Make it so! SunSeeker 6 hrs ago #3
They're projecting again surfered 4 hrs ago #4
if we have an ounce of intelligence we will go after right wing radio, fox, and every right-wing samsingh 4 hrs ago #5
But the general public lacks intelligence mdbl 3 hrs ago #7
Yes please!!! liberalla 3 hrs ago #6
You got that goddamn right! Ray Bruns 3 hrs ago #8
"...could trigger the FCC equal-time rule." Questions... Grins 1 hr ago #9
"Selective enforcement" has been the problem all along FakeNoose 1 hr ago #10

samsingh

(18,360 posts)
5. if we have an ounce of intelligence we will go after right wing radio, fox, and every right-wing
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 08:54 AM
4 hrs ago

rag out there.

mdbl

(8,391 posts)
7. But the general public lacks intelligence
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 10:00 AM
3 hrs ago

I learned that when Mush Bimbo became big on talk radio. It's been downhill ever since.

Grins

(9,357 posts)
9. "...could trigger the FCC equal-time rule." Questions...
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 11:32 AM
1 hr ago

- Isn't that the "Fairness Doctrine?" That Reagan blew to shit in 1987.*

- And in the following 39-years, when has the FCC ever pulled that trigger?

- And out of whose ass did CBS pull that nugget?

* Fun fact: The two federal judges who helped Reagan kill the Fairness Doctrine? Antonin Scalia, and Robert Bork.

FakeNoose

(41,002 posts)
10. "Selective enforcement" has been the problem all along
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 11:46 AM
1 hr ago

... because that's what brought in Rush Limbaugh's Repuke radio, and all of his horrible imitators.

Selective enforcement means no enforcement whenever the performers meet the approval of political leaders.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navarro: Democratic presi...