Extortion Using Smart Glasses Is a Thing Now
Source: Gizmodo
Theres a growing number of reasons to be skeptical about camera-equipped smart glasses, and you can now add extortion to that list. According to a report from the BBC, a woman who asked not to be named was recently filmed covertly while shopping in London by a man wearing smart glasses. That interaction was later posted to social media, where it racked up tens of thousands of views.
That story, unfortunately, isnt a new phenomenon. As other investigations have noted, smart glasses like the Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses are used regularly by menspecifically mento record women discreetly for content purposes. What makes this particular case reported by the BBC worse is that the man in question allegedly asked for money in exchange for taking the video down, claiming that removal was a paid service.
According to the BBC, the video was eventually taken down after being reported for violating TikToks rules on harassment and bullying, and the mans account was banned. The footage was, however, later reposted to a different social media site. The BBC reached out to the person who filmed the interaction, who, of course, denies trying to extort anyone, and the policewho were reportedly contactedsay they dont have enough information to launch an investigation.
In a nutshell, this is exactly the type of thing that has people up in arms about smart glasses as a category. While recording people discreetly can be done with a phone, holding a glass slab in front of someones face is a lot more likely to be clocked. The fact that the woman in this incident didnt know she was being filmed at all should tell you a lot, since it means the privacy light (and LED that lights up when you record) on the smart glasses being used was obscured or not visible enough to catch her attention.
-snip-
Read more: https://gizmodo.com/extortion-using-smart-glasses-is-a-thing-now-2000755562
BBC news video from 6 hours ago:
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cdxpqg22q34o
Have to wonder how often that creep - or others like him - extorted victims successfully without getting reported to media or the police.
niyad
(133,731 posts)blue-wave
(5,471 posts)will have to change or this whole extortion racket will get bigger. Filming you with malicious intent should never be allowed. The stiffer the fines and jail time the better.
mwmisses4289
(4,601 posts)Or are some of them in on it?!?
niyad
(133,731 posts)FakeNoose
(42,198 posts)Just sayin' that it works both ways
eppur_se_muova
(42,361 posts)FakeNoose
(42,198 posts)
Buddyzbuddy
(2,820 posts)"parties" start getting recorded and shared.
Cheezoholic
(3,840 posts)Skittles
(172,599 posts)yup
Jose Garcia
(3,534 posts)Skittles
(172,599 posts)and acting like it is porn?
Jose Garcia
(3,534 posts)So I suspect there is a bit more to the story than we are bring told here.
Skittles
(172,599 posts)yup
highplainsdem
(62,896 posts)It says the BBC is aware of one other woman who contacted that creep to ask that videos of her be taken down.
The guy has multiple platforms for these videos, no doubt monetized. He follows the women around.
The BBC found multiple accounts run by the same man across YouTube, Instagram, and Threads, which post similar content.
Meta, the company that owns Instagram and Threads, as well as making smart glasses, has not given the BBC a comment but has taken down the video of Alice which was reposted.
The YouTube account posting similar videos is no longer active.
Fil1957
(829 posts)I mean blackmailing someone for everyday activity? If someone caught me on video shopping and threatened to post it on the internet, would I even care? I don't think so.
Skittles
(172,599 posts)I always assume I could be filmed at any time - yeah I know, doesn't make it right, etc
cannabis_flower
(3,936 posts)I would be doing as anything that I could be extorted with. Now maybe if I was a Karen (apologies to nice women who just happen to be named Karen) or if I was running around practically naked. But I try not to be a Karen or do things I would be ashamed of in public.
Polybius
(22,070 posts)There had to have been a reason as to why it went viral in the first place.
niyad
(133,731 posts)like they do for still images. And think about this for a minute. We know nothing about this woman's life. She may have an abusive ex she is hiding from. Or she might be in GB's witsec program. Or she is just an ordinary citizen who objects to this kind of violation. Whatever her situation, what that fucking scum did was wrong. There are some very sick sites, and very sick people out there. And people have every right not to be brought unknowingly, unwillingly, to the attention of the sickos.
DivByZero
(50 posts)people had a name for people wearing them in bars or at parties, or anywhere really: Glassholes 😄
mwmisses4289
(4,601 posts)and notices letting people know that we are a public venue and visitors are being filmed by the cctv system and that people who visit might be taking pictures, or there could be filming for specific events going on. However, as far as I know, none of the pic takers are using their photos for extortion, and the cctv footage is more for us to have in case someone falls and gets injured.
Martin68
(28,026 posts)with multicolored mirrors on his hobnailed boots."