Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,433 posts)
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:27 AM Yesterday

Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund

Source: CBS News

Updated on: May 21, 2026 / 8:28 PM EDT


Washington — Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York introduced a bill Thursday to ban the use of federal money for paying out claims from the Justice Department's new "anti-weaponization" fund.

The bill, titled the Bipartisan Transparency for American Taxpayers Act, comes as Republicans fight over the nearly $1.8 billion fund that was established to compensate people who claim they were improperly targeted or investigated by the government. Allies and supporters of the president, including some of those involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, have said they plan to submit claims for payouts.

The fund was created as part of a settlement of a suit by President Trump against the IRS over a leak of his tax returns, a highly unusual arrangement that has elicited strong criticism from Democrats and a growing number of Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Fitzpatrick and Suozzi's two-page bill says "no federal funds … may be used for the payment of any claim submitted to the Anti-Weaponization Fund, established by the Department of Justice on May 18, 2026." "Congress has a constitutional responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and oversee federal spending," Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Taxpayer dollars will not become a discretionary payout fund. Transparency is not optional. Accountability is not negotiable."

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doj-fund-house-bill-fitzpatrick-suozzi/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
Weak, sequestered sauce bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
Just more Icanthinkformyself Yesterday #2
Who will vote on this bill? They've all left town for at least 2+ weeks FakeNoose Yesterday #3
It's not a settlement. Griefbird 22 hrs ago #4
Am I wrong ... oldsoldierfadingfast 21 hrs ago #5
This is a different bill BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #6
Got it together now - Thanks n/t oldsoldierfadingfast 15 hrs ago #7

bucolic_frolic

(55,882 posts)
1. Weak, sequestered sauce
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:30 AM
Yesterday

They have to forbid payments to convicted felon crooks and criminals. He'll just divert some safety net money if they don't restrict everything.

What kind of boobs run Congress?

Icanthinkformyself

(427 posts)
2. Just more
Fri May 22, 2026, 09:22 AM
Yesterday

performance politics from a corporate Dem who is out of touch with the Dem base, as are most of the Dem leadership, and a member of the Guardians Of Pedophiles party.

FakeNoose

(42,467 posts)
3. Who will vote on this bill? They've all left town for at least 2+ weeks
Fri May 22, 2026, 10:37 AM
Yesterday

I believe the House and Senate members should all be docked for 2 weeks' pay, but that's another issue.

Griefbird

(141 posts)
4. It's not a settlement.
Fri May 22, 2026, 04:19 PM
22 hrs ago

The suit was dropped, no judge was involved. No, it's a bank robbery. It's infuriating that msm continues to refer to it as a settlement when they should, at minimum, call it an illegal use of federal funds.

BumRushDaShow

(172,433 posts)
6. This is a different bill
Fri May 22, 2026, 06:03 PM
20 hrs ago

The one they fled from was a DHS/ICE appropriation (with added-on ballroom money since removed) using the reconciliation process to go around the 60-vote Rule in the Senate.

The OP bill is to forbid self-dealing by stopping any funding from going to that farcical "anti-weaponization" crap "settlement", and that self-dealing and promises to dish out money to criminals, just made things worse

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bipartisan House bill wou...