Standing Religious Liberty on its Head
On June 26, the Presidential Religious Liberty Commission released its draft report, a 224-page document timed to coincide with the nations 250th anniversary of independence. The commission, established by executive order on May 1, 2025, was charged with examining the foundations of religious liberty in America and recommending policies to protect it.
Commission chairman Dan Patrick, the Texas lieutenant governor, told the commissions final hearing in April that the language of the First Amendment which requires that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof does not mandate the separation of church and state. A single paragraph near the conclusion of the report offers the most revealing insight into the commissions focus.
The concept of a wall of separation between church and state can wrongly imply that church and state are opposed to one another and must remain completely separate. In reality, however, church and state strengthen and support one another. Perhaps a better analogy is that religious liberty acts as a bridge between church and state.
Read that again slowly. A commission called the Religious Liberty Commission has just redefined religious liberty to mean the opposite of what the term has meant for more than a century. The wall comes down. The bridge goes up. And the change is presented not as a radical departure but as a friendly clarification.
https://www.postalley.org/2026/07/09/standing-religious-liberty-on-its-head/
biophile
(1,762 posts)We need strong organizations to help fight this - along with voting for candidates who support the separation of church and state.
eppur_se_muova
(43,040 posts)THEIR VERSION of religion, and exclude all others, with maybe a few exceptions for really, really similar cults.
Igel
(37,744 posts)I don't think we read the same report. It's not "hand on!" but "hands off!"
Yeah, that paragraph and some other proof-texts can be held to argue something that the surrounding text doesn't support and might even suggest is not quite right. Hence "proof-texting" as a pejorative in exegesis.
BTW, I was a pretty strict sabbatarian for a long time myself, and remember blue laws in Maryland long, long after the 1880s. Even in TX, you realize you have friends coming over and you'd like to serve mixed drinks but the liquor cabinet's dry, you can buy wine and beer (only after noon, not before), but nothing harder than that on Sunday. So if you're a sabbatarian and are talking at services Saturday morning about next day's plans, but it's summer so the liquor stores might be closed by the time the sun's down, you're out of luck.
(Under the proposals, a sabbatarian could sue to stay closed Saturday and open on Sunday--because religious discrimination.)