A Ghanian
Paper Using
The Runge-
Kuta Method
To Solve The
Bateman Eqn
More Honest
News Than
Bezos WP
and the
Trumpist
NY Times
Wait for the
Answer to
Orrex is
Yes! Yes!
Yes! Yes!
YES!
In history,
tyrants
always
fall.
Think of it.
Always.
Whatever
you are,
be a
good one
RESISTANCE
IS NOT
FUTILE!
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Photography
Related: About this forum
CaliforniaPeggy
(154,854 posts)It's also about white, blue and black and the regular patterns that are created by all these elements!
I really like this.
Thank you!
Seems like you're up late tonight . . . You OK?
Mousetoescamper
(6,484 posts)My sleep pattern has been disrupted since the holidays. Otherwise, everything's fine. Thanks for asking, my friend.
mitch96
(15,413 posts)Look for angles/leading lines to the subject and find contrast.. or as she put it.. "tension"..
I started looking at Professional photographers "quick shots" and a lot of what she said showed up..
Works for me!
m
Mousetoescamper
(6,484 posts)Good advice from your friend! I'm always looking for leading lines, angles, shadows and contrasts. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
mitch96
(15,413 posts)the rule of ⅓'s etc. Now it's take a shit load of digital images on automatic exposure and upload to photoshop for "post processing" to make it look presentable.
Same history as with my old profession as a Radiologic Technologist. Back in the day it was the tech who manipulated the factors on the machine to get a diagnostic image. Now it's all automatic exposure control to get "readable" images...not great images. Then go to post processing before the MD sees the images.
Ahhh progress...
m
Mousetoescamper
(6,484 posts)I sometimes developed/cropped/printed B+W photos when I worked for community newspapers as chief cook and bottle washer. The job included everything but running the presses. I was glad to have some darkroom skills and liked controlling the process, but didn't enjoy being in what were usually poorly ventilated darkrooms. My personal color film was usually sent to a commercial processor and I was seldom satisfied with the results. For a few years I took my exposed film to a local photo shop whose owner would tweak things to my liking. Now I do all of it on my 15-year-old MacBook using the stock Apple photo program.
I always shoot in RAW and switch to manual exposure and focus for astrophotography and artsy projects like the ones I posted under the titles "The life aquatic" and "Antique glassware" earlier this week. My lenses in auto mode are slow and often less accurate than if I take the time to focus manually. Auto is the only way to go when there's no time for adjustments.
Apparently, film photography is making a comeback. I can't see going back to expensive film and processing, waiting for the prints to come back and lower resolution images. Maybe it's considered more "authentic."
Callalily
(15,175 posts)Mousetoescamper
(6,484 posts)justaprogressive
(5,146 posts)
Mousetoescamper
(6,484 posts)