A Ghanian
Paper Using
The Runge-
Kuta Method
To Solve The
Bateman Eqn
More Honest
News Than
Bezos WP
and the
Trumpist
NY Times
Wait for the
Answer to
Orrex is
Yes! Yes!
Yes! Yes!
YES!
In history,
tyrants
always
fall.
Think of it.
Always.
Whatever
you are,
be a
good one
RESISTANCE
IS NOT
FUTILE!
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
white faced monkey headshots from today
i accidentally shot these all in crop mode so they were APS-C sized and lower resolution.....it was late afternoon and dim so ISO was 4000 to 5000 on each of them.....plus i cropped them even smaller. the images were very noisy, so i ran them through adobe's AI denoise and did some other processing.
= new reply since forum marked as read
These look great to my eye!
What is APS-C sized? I need to be educated!
Wonderful photos, dear Gato . . .
the micro 4/3 sensor is called 4/3, not because it has a 4:3 aspect ratio (it does, but so do all of the smaller sensors), but because 4/3 of an inch (1 and a third inches) is the diameter of a 1950s vidicon tube that would be needed to surround the sensor. if you're confused as to why they would use that system to name a sensor, join the club. here's a little bit about that:
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4159871805/making-sensor-sizes-less-misleading
here is a graphic showing the common sized sensors next to each other so you can compare them visually:
and, yes, you are correct...the nikon bridge cameras (P950, P1000, etc) have the tiny 1/2.3 sensors....with such a huge crop factor, this is what allows them to zoom to ridiculously long full frame telephoto focal length equivalents. i think the sony bridge cameras use the 1" (remember, that means that you'd need a 1 inch vidicon tube to surround it) which is only a bit smaller than a 4/3.
a lot of people (generally knuckleheads parroting what they hear other people say) in the online photography forums will claim you need a full frame camera because all crop sensors are practically useless. while there are clear advantages to full frame cameras, there are also advantages to crop sensors, and 4/3 is a sweet spot, IMHO, for certain things like macro and close-up photography. a 20MP M4/3 sensor has higher resolution than even my nikon Z8....what i mean is that it has a tighter pixel density. remember, you're jamming 20 million pixels into a sensor not much more than 25% of the size of a full frame sensor....that would be the equivalent resolution of a full frame sensor with almost 80MP. so, when photographing at 1:1 or greater magnification, you're getting a lot more resolution on your subject on a 20MP M43 sensor than any high resolution full frame sensor nikon, canon or sony makes. additionally, because the sensor is about a quarter of the size of a full frame sensor, when you're doing close up photography (not macro) of subjects like small animals (like frogs, for instance) you can really back off, even with something like a 60mm macro lens, in order to fill the frame. now in this case, you're sacrificing resolution when compared to a full frame camera with a macro lens, which could fill a 46MP frame with something like a small frog, but you're going to get way more depth of field at sweet spot apertures, like f/7.1, for example. also, when photographing frogs and other small animals at night (where you need a speedlight, modeling light and diffuser) in-situ, your rig is lighter and way more agile than a full frame set up.
your pictures are such TREATS, I LOVE THEM 
Nice job on the processing.
is less fearful, more seeking to understand...