Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
I am
too old
for this
shit
too old
for this
shit
Find one in
every car...
You\'ll see.
The life of
a repo man
is always
intense
a repo man
is always
intense
Survived the
70\'s...
Was a
Challenge.
Surviving My
70s
so far...
70\'s...
Was a
Challenge.
Surviving My
70s
so far...
Woke Up To
A Ghanian
Paper Using
The Runge-
Kuta Method
To Solve The
Bateman Eqn
A Ghanian
Paper Using
The Runge-
Kuta Method
To Solve The
Bateman Eqn
Support DU.
More Honest
News Than
Bezos WP
and the
Trumpist
NY Times
More Honest
News Than
Bezos WP
and the
Trumpist
NY Times
Check out
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
all the stickies
on Grovelbot's
Big Board!
Hanging in the sky tonight
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
The image isn't rotated.
The discrepancy in rotation between the two images seems to be 90 degrees.
The orientation of the lunarscape in my photo is about 45 degrees counterclockwise from the orientation shown in the above image from Fourmilab. I think that the Fourmilab image shows the moon as it appeared on midnight on December 12.
Words fail me.
I've never seen the moon at this angle before. It looks so spherical, so luminous. I am gobsmacked!
The sky was clear and the moon was nearly full (coming Dec. 15). I don't usually try to shoot this phase because it lacks the shadows that make the craters and mountains pop. As an experiment I matched the exposure time to the ISO. The photo turned out better than expected.
ISO 100 (my usual setting for the moon)
f16
1/100 sec