Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(21,925 posts)
25. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
Tue Jun 17, 2025, 12:11 PM
Jun 17
How quickly could Iran build its first nuclear weapon? Look at China

How quickly could Iran make an atomic bomb once it has acquired enough weapons-grade uranium? Some nuclear experts argue it would take Iran anywhere between several months to up to a year. But China’s experience shows that Tehran could build a bomb much faster—in as little as three to five weeks.[1]

***

Portions of Iran’s “nuclear archive,” which Israel seized in January 2018, clearly show Iran’s weaponization projects running in parallel with HEU projects under the “Amad Plan,” Iran’s code name for a crash nuclear weapons program that operated from 1999 to 2003. The Amad Plan aimed to produce five 10-kiloton nuclear weapons by early 2004, including four deliverable warheads for the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, and another one for testing underground.

***

China’s insights. Given the similarities between Iran’s bomb and China’s 596/548 atomic bomb designs, the technical bottlenecks and timelines of China’s bomb development can shed light on Iran’s possible bomb development timelines.

The major hurdles China faced when making its first atomic bomb included the weapon design, neutron sources, the detonation wave focusing system, “cold” (or subcritical) tests, and uranium metal components production. All these are non-nuclear weapon components tasks that can be completed before HEU production, the most time-consuming step in the Chinese atomic bomb program. Once China produced HEU, it took abou three to five weeks from having sufficient UF6 gas to an assembled uranium bomb.
thttps://thebulletin.org/2025/01/how-quickly-could-iran-build-its-first-nuclear-weapon-look-at-china/

Three to five weeks is fairly imminent, unless one believes Israel should wait until Tel Aviv is leveled.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

no program creon Jun 17 #1
Yep Goddessartist Jun 17 #2
Just a cache of near-weapons grade enriched uranium expanded by 50% in the last 3 months--enough for 10 bombs Ponietz Jun 17 #3
The Point Is That It Is Not An "Imminent Threat" As Is Claimed That Was Necessarly Worthy Of This Strike MayReasonRule Jun 17 #5
"Imminent" can mean whatever Ponietz Jun 17 #6
Your idea of imminent and Israel's idea of imminent are far different, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #9
Your Assessment Is As Valid As The Individual That Posted On Bluesky MayReasonRule Jun 17 #14
Certainly, I mean, Israel wouldn't lie about that. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 17 #16
The problem is you can't be one day late Melon Jun 17 #24
TSF will bomb Iran anyway. no_hypocrisy Jun 17 #4
Their foreign policy calls for the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. nt LexVegas Jun 17 #7
And Israel's foreign policy calls for the end of Palestine. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 17 #17
How can you end something that doesn't exist? tritsofme Jun 17 #22
147 UN member states would disagree with you. Cuthbert Allgood Jun 17 #35
OP posted a thread that says Iran has no nuclear weapons program MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #23
Fetterman forgot about PNAC Kid Berwyn Jun 17 #8
This is pure bull, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 17 #10
K... MayReasonRule Jun 17 #15
This is sophistry at best, more likely just pure apologism for the Iranian regime. tritsofme Jun 17 #11
The Individual That Posted On Bluesky Does Not Have Any History Of Being An Aplogist For Iran As Far As I Know MayReasonRule Jun 17 #18
Is he getting his intelligence from Lindsey Graham? Emile Jun 17 #12
He's Not A Supporter Of Linsay Graham From What I've Seen... Quite The Opposite Emile MayReasonRule Jun 17 #20
But according to Netanyahu, Iran has been just weeks away from having a nuke indusurb Jun 17 #13
Thank Jehoshaphat there is a meme sarisataka Jun 17 #19
No Doubt That Is Correct... The Reason Given For The Attack Is That There Is An "Imminent Threat" MayReasonRule Jun 17 #21
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists sarisataka Jun 17 #25
"unless one believes Israel should wait until Tel Aviv is leveled" Dreamer Tatum Jun 17 #27
Thank You For The Follow Up! MayReasonRule Jun 17 #28
de nada sarisataka Jun 17 #29
The IAEA disagrees. ForgedCrank Jun 17 #26
I'll Have To Read Through These This Evening...Thank You For Posting The Info Within The Thread! MayReasonRule Jun 17 #30
What is the greatest threat? The possibility that Iran might have a nuke program, or thousands of nukes that are ready Doodley Jun 17 #31
Trump is trying to get us into that war. OrlandoDem2 Jun 17 #32
I don't actually believe that Happy Hoosier Jun 17 #33
Some years back, WSJ had an article that various countries had a 'nuclear weapons program'. Norrrm Jun 17 #34
I bet other countries in the ME have nuke program kwolf68 Jun 17 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is no nuclear weapo...»Reply #25