Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Renew Deal

(84,260 posts)

3. I agree

Reply to WarGamer (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 17, 2025, 04:29 PM

Jun 17

I think the risk calculation would have been different. It doesn't mean that they wouldn't do it, but there is a difference between constant artillery bombardment and occasional missiles.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the US have done the same thing to North Korea to prevent them from getting nukes? [View all] Renew Deal Jun 17 OP

No. Because of the proximity of NK to SK and American bases... WarGamer Jun 17 #1

I agree Renew Deal Jun 17 #3

Yep, the situation is different DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 17 #5

I don't think it has anything to do with nukes Uncle Joe Jun 17 #2

N. Korea never made nuclear weapons or long range ballistic missiles until W screwed the pooch on that Botany Jun 17 #4

I have never been able to understand the hypocrisy of nuclear weapons walkingman Jun 17 #6

The world should have done more to prevent a nuclear North Korea Mosby Jun 17 #7