General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Has anyone noticed how veering to the right is never considered "too far," but even the slightest move to the left... [View all]Ronnie Rat Raygun was the start of things. It started with his October Surprise, where he cheated to win the election to get into office.
He destroyed the Fairness Doctrine, which led to the rise of Fox "News." The HUD grant scandal, the Superfund scandal, the S&L crisis, The military contracts scandal, were some of the worst things he was guilty of officiating.
The lobbying scandal which started the revolving door from government to lobbyists, back to government led to the eventual overseeing of agencies by former corporate executives that were regulated by the same agencies that they were leading. Then when they left, they went back into that industry.
He led the country into two of the worst recessions in history (at the time). While he robbed Social Security of funds. This made it "necessary" for him to double contributions to the fund.
The grade-B actor managed to convince people that he was a great leader, when all he was doing was following the orders of his corporate bribers... I mean donors.
This may not be all of how it started. There was much more.
However, what got me so extremely pissed off, was the fact that he rejected early funding into the AIDS pandemic. He even called AIDS a "gay cancer." This hit home with me, in that I lost my younger brother to AIDS in the mid 80s. Had there had been funding for AIDS, they would likely have found the drugs that helps many survive. It still tees me off to this day.
And the Dems believe that they have to compromise with this evil crap. I guess it went crazy when Dems discovered that they could get in on the corporate grifting soon after Raygun's time.
I am sure that there is more. Like the welfare moms driving Cadillacs. Sheesh. I can't keep writing about all this, it gets me so angry.
And the Dems still believe that they have to compromise with this.
Why not call them out, and give solutions? It is how to win over the people.
Edit history
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):