Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Abnredleg

(1,151 posts)
5. Remember all those cases in 2020 that went to trial?
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 06:53 AM
Jun 27

They all crashed and burned. The burden of proof to get to trial is far lower than what is required to prevail so the fact that discovery is going on doesn’t mean much.

As to my sources, they are direct quotes from the either the Board of Elections or NY Statute. And yes, I’ve read the complaint and it is nonsensical, as has been pointed out by other people in the other threads on this topic. All the schemes require connectivity and no one has presented any evidence on how that can be done, just conjecture that requires ignoring all the security protocols, protocols that you are studiously ignoring. We went through this magical hand waving in 2020, with “statistically impossible results” and every claim fell to pieces under scrutiny. We know how well the security protocols work from all those trials and they only got stronger after that election. Yes, there is always a chance of human error, but large scale fraud that can influence the results is another matter all together. All the campaigns, with all those experienced staffers, were not surprised by the results and accepted them.

Hence the dead horse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2024 Election Results Law...»Reply #5