Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

valleyrogue

(2,274 posts)

4. I will never understand this reasoning.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sat Jun 28, 2025, 01:42 PM

Jun 28

Of course the parents were going to win this case; it is really a no-brainer. That's because when there is controversial content being used in classrooms, parental consent has always been required for their kids to read the books. Ditto for films being shown in class.

They can have alternative books.

It has always been this way. A school district messed up by not having consent forms. The sticking point is the mandatory nature of having students read the materials.

Raskin is off-base here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Raskin on LGBTQ books ruling: Implications are 'breathtaking' [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 28 OP

So when is the bible going to be banned. Chipper Chat Jun 28 #1

If I live in TX or Louisiana can I opt my kid out Ocelot II Jun 28 #2

We're living in Gilead, soon to be red robes and white bonnets for women and hangings on the town square... wcmagumba Jun 28 #3

I will never understand this reasoning. valleyrogue Jun 28 #4