Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

intrepidity

(8,399 posts)
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 01:14 AM Jul 18

Maybe they didn't publish the actual drawing because [View all]

the image is of a *very* young female--the description by WSJ says

A pair of small arcs denotes the woman’s breasts, and the future president’s signature is a squiggly “Donald” below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.

Really interesting emphasis on the size of the arcs eh? (yes. i bolded it but "small" was by WSJ)

Also, his signature being interpreted as pubic hair could be misleading, since he didn't *actually" draw any hair at all, just put his name over a bare pubis.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe they didn't publish...