Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I just want to add a comment to those thinking the voting marital name change issue is not a problem [View all]TalenaGor
(1,196 posts)96. gotcha - I live in a differnt state now so I didnt have much of a choice lol
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I just want to add a comment to those thinking the voting marital name change issue is not a problem [View all]
hlthe2b
Yesterday
OP
At least till Congress requires it is the bottom line. And if it takes months to gather your documents,
pnwmom
16 hrs ago
#141
My maga sister is one of those who stupidly says it is no big deal. Not to her, she is rich.
Trueblue1968
Yesterday
#3
Every obstacle to make it harder to vote ... now who would that benefit ... I wonder who .... Could it be ....
eppur_se_muova
Yesterday
#5
She also discussed the voting issue. Are you claiming I am lying? You need the birth certificate
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#8
Because you couldn't possibly google or keep up: House GOP tramples on women's rights with passage of SAVE Act
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#53
And you think those affected will have the time to react if it is signed/enacted?
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#57
They are clearly delaying to the last minute to ensure women have no chance to respond...
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#64
How many House Democrats did you think were going to vote to honor Charlie Kirk?
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#73
Did you believe that Roe vs Wade could never be overturned? Or the Voting Rights Act be gutted? The GOP ...
Hekate
5 hrs ago
#163
Because it hasn't passed the Senate yet. They are likely waiting till close to
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#54
Exactly. They want to pass/enact it at last minute to prevent women from having the chance
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#60
I seriously can't deal with this anymore. We are actually needing to defend the idea that this is not a good thing.
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#67
And you missed the fact that, in practice, many women will need to provide both.
Scrivener7
22 hrs ago
#121
You seem to miss the point of what the birth certificate requirement is for
SickOfTheOnePct
22 hrs ago
#126
I'm not trying to downplay it but the majority of women would not be impacted immediately.
Wiz Imp
Yesterday
#110
How many women moved, changed their name or changed party registration last year?
Scrivener7
23 hrs ago
#114
Somebody needs to look up the word downplay and perhaps rewrite their title.
Ilikepurple
21 hrs ago
#129
You're sure Republicans won't get rid of the filibuster to assure they stay in power?
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#90
No. You're not sure. You're no more sure of that than people were sure Roe v. Wade would hold.
Scrivener7
23 hrs ago
#115
OK. So you've informed us bout your infallibility, and about the fact that you are OK with Democratic citizens
Scrivener7
22 hrs ago
#123
SAVE act requires a birth certificate to vote if you legally changed your name...
haele
Yesterday
#98
I've been amazed at the Democratic/left pooh-poohing on this issue since the early push for RealID for voting
Ms. Toad
Yesterday
#9
This requirement for women to prove their maiden name is exactly that. It requires a birth certificate to vote.
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#30
What requirement for women to prove their maiden name in order to vote? n/t
SickOfTheOnePct
Yesterday
#32
I'll bet 50-75% of men don't have a clue where their BC is. I had to buy one years ago
Bengus81
Yesterday
#79
The old style birth certificates that I got in the early 'seventies from the county courthouse...
hunter
Yesterday
#13
A few years ago I had to get birth certificates for different relatives across 3 different states
ClaudetteCC
Yesterday
#28
It is definitely a misogynist move. Most of us do change our names at marriage...
Hekate
Yesterday
#16
Isn't it standard practice to already have copies of one's birth certificate on hand?
Kaleva
Yesterday
#23
Kindly reread my OP and that of Hunter (#13). Certainly not the RW MAGA to blame for
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#26
LOL...I've been voting in Kansas since 1972 and a BC has never been required.
Bengus81
Yesterday
#80
Real ID has a number of options. You can do it without a birth certificates.
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#35
Only if your current driver's license was obtained with documents proving your full legal name
Ms. Toad
Yesterday
#91
Blame women....Blame poor women. especially after I detailed the $76 it cost me to replace mine
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#41
just went through this - dont forget the notary fee for the document Vitalchek needs +$20
TalenaGor
Yesterday
#27
For gawd's sakes. What percentage of this nations' women live in the state of their birth
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#49
If they don't know, they aren't financially secure, trapped in a horrible controlling or violent marriage
hlthe2b
7 hrs ago
#158
gotcha - I live in a differnt state now so I didnt have much of a choice lol
TalenaGor
Yesterday
#96
"Roe v. Wade will never fall." "No Democratic House member would ever vote to honor Kirk."
Scrivener7
23 hrs ago
#119
K&R. I didn't see the original thread, but I think some of its poo-poo overflowed
Torchlight
Yesterday
#56
There is a lot of social pressure in many communities for a woman to change her name.
hunter
Yesterday
#93
Seems to be the attitude--even among quite a few (male, I assume) DUers on this thread
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#66
And my favorite: "Well, it wouldn't be an issue for ME, so it isn't an issue!"
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#113
I recall an article about a poor man in Wisconsin who kept driving to Chicago repeatedly to get his birth certificate
lostnfound
Yesterday
#68
Also sealioning! Also dismissing! Also misinformation! It's a bonanza of obnoxiousness!
Scrivener7
23 hrs ago
#116
Using "never" is really silly. Some states DID and all or nearly all DO. But that isn't the point
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#101
You aren't even responding to the issues on this thread. Not having read any of it, obviously.
hlthe2b
21 hrs ago
#133
Most of us (at lest the majority women on this thread know). The men mostlly have shown they
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#112
The clear message here is that if a bunch of women lose the right to vote, it's no big deal.
Scrivener7
22 hrs ago
#124
This will discourage women from taking their husband's names when they marry.
milestogo
22 hrs ago
#125
To the handful of naysayers: "this will never happen" on this thread--SEE THE POST ABOVE #136
hlthe2b
10 hrs ago
#143
True that it's an expense. But overall, why not see the expense as an investment in original documents, which
ancianita
9 hrs ago
#151
For gawd's sakes, ancianita, it is an equity issue and an intentional effort to disenfranchise women!
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#152