I remain doubting malaise

[EdmondDantes_]

58. I've gone to their website. It's not even remotely evidence

Let's take their "evidence" for North Carolina.

https://electiontruthalliance.org/analysis/north-carolina/

Their first point is down ticket races where Democrats performed relatively better than Harris. Apparently split ticket voting with the most polarizing candidate in history isn't a thing.

Then there's the claim that there are differences between early voting and election day voting. Sure they have graphs, but they don't explain how they came to their conclusions. Why did they pick a random country in Minnesota as their proof? And when hypothesis 1 that more Republican voters show up on election day compared to Democrats, well we know that's true. See all the red mirage talk in explaining why Trump was lying about the 2020 election. Discounting the truth to reach your conclusion isn't intellectually honest.

Their third point is that RFK Jr was ordered removed from the ballot, but they don't explain how that would impact the vote.

They finish with a call for an audit, but didn't review the audit results from North Carolina.

https://www.ncsbe.gov/about-elections/election-security/post-election-procedures-and-audits

How is any of that convincing evidence?