Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

UTUSN

(75,919 posts)

3. Yip, it's a surprise to me in this news item that BURNETT said he wasn't pro-KRASNOV.

Reply to Totally Tunsie (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 28, 2025, 01:44 PM

Sep 28

What little I assumed was that he was. Perhaps he and his wife, with their religious bent, might have come to disapprove of KRASNOV but they've made a mint and a cushy political appointment with him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Totally Tunsie

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's not destruction of *evidence* without charges? - Why would Mark BURNETT keep his KRASNOV material? [View all] UTUSN Sep 28 OP

This entire travesty of the Chump years can be laid on the shoulders of Mark Burnett. Totally Tunsie Sep 28 #1

Yip, it's a surprise to me in this news item that BURNETT said he wasn't pro-KRASNOV. UTUSN Sep 28 #3

So, I guess Billy Bush has moved past all that and is returning back to one of the entertainment hlthe2b Sep 28 #2