Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jake Tapper clashes with House Dem in heated exchange: 'May not be a big deal for you!' [View all]UpInArms
(53,606 posts)8. Project 2025
        
          https://www.25and.me/?topics=3#3
          
          
          
        
         Food Assistance
Project 2025 will...
...apply cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This means that many people who need help buying food would no longer get money from the government to buy food. [298]
...require states to implement work requirements for SNAP recipients. This means that people who are able to work would have to get a job or do some type of work in order to get food stamps. [299]
...eliminate broad-based categorical eligibility. This would make it harder for people to get food stamps because they would have to meet more requirements to be eligible. [300]
...eliminate the heat-and-eat loophole. This would make it harder for people to get the full amount of food stamps they are eligible for. [301]
...reform the Thrifty Food Plan. This could lead to people getting less money in food stamps because the government would change how it calculates the amount of money people need to buy food. [300]
...eliminate CEP. This would mean that some children who currently get free school meals would have to pay for them. [303]
Project 2025 will...
...apply cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This means that many people who need help buying food would no longer get money from the government to buy food. [298]
...require states to implement work requirements for SNAP recipients. This means that people who are able to work would have to get a job or do some type of work in order to get food stamps. [299]
...eliminate broad-based categorical eligibility. This would make it harder for people to get food stamps because they would have to meet more requirements to be eligible. [300]
...eliminate the heat-and-eat loophole. This would make it harder for people to get the full amount of food stamps they are eligible for. [301]
...reform the Thrifty Food Plan. This could lead to people getting less money in food stamps because the government would change how it calculates the amount of money people need to buy food. [300]
...eliminate CEP. This would mean that some children who currently get free school meals would have to pay for them. [303]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							76 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                        Jake Tapper clashes with House Dem in heated exchange: 'May not be a big deal for you!' [View all]
							SocialDemocrat61
							Wednesday
							OP
                        
        
        Tried to tell the USA that shithole and comrades were going to destroy the country....................
        Lovie777
        Wednesday
        #2
      
        
        It's fascinating that the right thinks that (or pushes) CNN as some liberal outlet. It's been enabling the right for...
        Jbraybarten
        Wednesday
        #55
      
        
        If Tapper is so opposed to a short term solution he should put pressure on the Republicans.
        Baitball Blogger
        Wednesday
        #4
      
        
        I'm not sure perpetuating this sub-thread unrelated to Jake Tapper advances your point.  nt
        Gore1FL
        Wednesday
        #45
      
        
        He's a Trump apologist who wrote a book attacking President Biden's mental acuity.
        Patton French
        Wednesday
        #29
      
        
        Good for her. Enough with the media downplaying or otherwise enabling the GOP's bullshit
        Jbraybarten
        Wednesday
        #15
      
  