General Discussion

highplainsdem

(59,260 posts)

16. Why post AI results? Gemini can get things wrong as well. Please don't post AI slop here.

Reply to lapfog_1 (Reply #11)

Fri Nov 28, 2025, 03:48 PM

Nov 28

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rictofen

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scientific reports in the age of AI - This actually got published at Nature.com [View all] highplainsdem Nov 28 OP

The new paradigm is minimal editorial oversight... Wounded Bear Nov 28 #1

That figure shouldn't have gotten past anyone who wasn't blind. Including the author. highplainsdem Nov 28 #5

No argument here...nt Wounded Bear Nov 28 #6

I'd be looking hard at the reviewers SheltieLover Nov 28 #2

AI reviewers? KT2000 Nov 28 #3

"Peers" of the author, apparently nilram Nov 28 #13

Famous author: dalton99a Nov 28 #4

Vocational ! College of Press ! and Publishing ! ... just the sort of place you'd expect to be doing autism research. eppur_se_muova Nov 28 #12

"...it went through two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers." LudwigPastorius Nov 28 #7

Just the thing Bobby Brainworm can wave around as proof he was right about everything. tanyev Nov 28 #8

Anyone looking to ANY dot-com for reliable information needs education Maru Kitteh Nov 28 #9

Holy crap -- look at the "m"(?) in "frymblal" -- it's the weirdest typo ever. eppur_se_muova Nov 28 #10

It is not cromulent because of inadequately embiggened research and review. yonder Nov 28 #15

🤣 tanyev Nov 28 #19

Now we're talking! yonder Nov 28 #26

from Gemini ( Google AI ) lapfog_1 Nov 28 #11

Why post AI results? Gemini can get things wrong as well. Please don't post AI slop here. highplainsdem Nov 28 #16

AI slop? lapfog_1 Nov 28 #18

If you use generative AI even though it's trained on stolen intellectual property, you're acting unethically. highplainsdem Nov 28 #21

so the problem is not that it is "slop" but that it works really well lapfog_1 Nov 28 #27

GenAI is always hallucinating, not reasoning, not aware of what it regurgitated. But some of its highplainsdem Nov 28 #28

The entire internet is slop? Cirsium Saturday #37

most of the content of the internet is not original thought lapfog_1 Saturday #38

Sad Cirsium Saturday #40

Am adding "AI sleuths" to my lifelong list of Annoying Irritants (AI) - UTUSN Nov 28 #14

You've seen people asking if something from a mainstream news source is AI? Asking about it here highplainsdem Nov 28 #20

Yea, at DU at least once, a month ago. The other, irritating latest one was UTUSN Nov 28 #31

Where's the latest one, the one you find irritating? highplainsdem Nov 28 #32

The undeniable one I self deleted as soon as the sleuth found out. UTUSN Nov 28 #33

UTUSN, you just uncovered more stuff being done by the person creating fake Obama videos earlier! highplainsdem Nov 28 #34

You have *way* *far* deeper grip on the whole subject than I will ever have - or *want*! UTUSN Nov 28 #35

There's so much of this deepfake type garbage on YouTube that they'd need fulltime staff to hunt highplainsdem Nov 28 #36

Just pathetic -- peer reviewed my ass Lettuce Be Nov 28 #17

Went through two peer reviews? haele Nov 28 #22

"The primary objectives of this research are ... To develop an explainable AI framework using TabPFNMix and SHAP for struggle4progress Nov 28 #23

I am running out of "disgusted" synonyms to really describe my reaction to this. hlthe2b Nov 28 #24

Just this morning I read about people inserting typos and mixed fonts... LAS14 Nov 28 #25

Cloudflare got shut down for 10 hours last week because of one typo in an executable file. Initech Nov 28 #29

It's crazy how fast we went from 0 to 60 on AI. Initech Nov 28 #30

This is tangential to this thread jfz9580m Saturday #39