Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,294 posts)
39. This is tangential to this thread
Sat Nov 29, 2025, 03:38 AM
Saturday

But as I was infuriated by heavy traffic on the street outside, I was thinking about the use of big data and ai riding this wave, with bullshit “studies” in tow.

I needed to rant in an ai thread so forgive me highplainsdem as it is only tangentially related best case to your op.

One infuriating thing I suspect is that with the various deregulated real world experiments ongoing in Ai and big data (which clearly encroach into the real world) they try to build junk like this:
https://www.noemamag.com/are-we-accidentally-building-a-planetary-brain/

Obviously left or right they would kick out environmentalists, scientists, journalists or regulators who don’t go just along with stuff. O They also have the most bogus types of inhouse “critics” (think the FB oversight board).

It is bound to be the most corrupt, sexist and sleazy space grab imaginable. They usually do just about anything in the most anti-democratic exploitative way imaginable the world over.

It always follows the same pattern wrt any scientist/journalist or regulator who doesn’t play ball: Timnit Gebru was fired by Google; Maria Ressa was persecuted; Madhav Gadgil’s “Gadgil report” was tossed aside by the corrupt communist CM Pinarayi Vijayan of the state of Kerala. That last is an example of how ecologists or evolutionary biologists who are not bought and paid for by corrupt business interests are thwarted when environmental laws and wildlife rhythms are messed up by poorly regulated technologists..
And with the surveillance state, the implicit threat of the use of any triviality (e.g.: marijuana laws) to harass complainants is ever present. I am so glad on that head that Duterte was sent to The Hague.

They want to build these things using big data, dubious ai and deregulated emerging technologies. They won’t stand for regulation or scientific methods in any serious sense.

This guy seems like a crank (not that I should be attacking anyone else on that head ) and worse he talks to irredeemable creeps like Roger MacNamee, but even guys like this are bashing this ai push:

https://www.the-geyser.com/ai-defends-the-status-quo/

And anything “open” sold by Google or its creepy small fellow travellers would be bilge.
(Tristan Harris, MacNamee etc define astroturf unlike say the always awesome, universal hater Yasha Levine. Zitron is also trustworthy. Haters are the only people I listen to anymore.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The new paradigm is minimal editorial oversight... Wounded Bear Nov 28 #1
That figure shouldn't have gotten past anyone who wasn't blind. Including the author. highplainsdem Nov 28 #5
No argument here...nt Wounded Bear Nov 28 #6
I'd be looking hard at the reviewers SheltieLover Nov 28 #2
AI reviewers? KT2000 Nov 28 #3
"Peers" of the author, apparently nilram Nov 28 #13
Famous author: dalton99a Nov 28 #4
Vocational ! College of Press ! and Publishing ! ... just the sort of place you'd expect to be doing autism research. eppur_se_muova Nov 28 #12
"...it went through two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers." LudwigPastorius Nov 28 #7
Just the thing Bobby Brainworm can wave around as proof he was right about everything. tanyev Nov 28 #8
Anyone looking to ANY dot-com for reliable information needs education Maru Kitteh Nov 28 #9
Holy crap -- look at the "m"(?) in "frymblal" -- it's the weirdest typo ever. eppur_se_muova Nov 28 #10
It is not cromulent because of inadequately embiggened research and review. yonder Nov 28 #15
🤣 tanyev Nov 28 #19
Now we're talking! yonder Nov 28 #26
from Gemini ( Google AI ) lapfog_1 Nov 28 #11
Why post AI results? Gemini can get things wrong as well. Please don't post AI slop here. highplainsdem Nov 28 #16
AI slop? lapfog_1 Nov 28 #18
If you use generative AI even though it's trained on stolen intellectual property, you're acting unethically. highplainsdem Nov 28 #21
so the problem is not that it is "slop" but that it works really well lapfog_1 Nov 28 #27
GenAI is always hallucinating, not reasoning, not aware of what it regurgitated. But some of its highplainsdem Nov 28 #28
The entire internet is slop? Cirsium Saturday #37
most of the content of the internet is not original thought lapfog_1 Saturday #38
Sad Cirsium Saturday #40
Am adding "AI sleuths" to my lifelong list of Annoying Irritants (AI) - UTUSN Nov 28 #14
You've seen people asking if something from a mainstream news source is AI? Asking about it here highplainsdem Nov 28 #20
Yea, at DU at least once, a month ago. The other, irritating latest one was UTUSN Nov 28 #31
Where's the latest one, the one you find irritating? highplainsdem Nov 28 #32
The undeniable one I self deleted as soon as the sleuth found out. UTUSN Nov 28 #33
UTUSN, you just uncovered more stuff being done by the person creating fake Obama videos earlier! highplainsdem Nov 28 #34
You have *way* *far* deeper grip on the whole subject than I will ever have - or *want*! UTUSN Nov 28 #35
There's so much of this deepfake type garbage on YouTube that they'd need fulltime staff to hunt highplainsdem Nov 28 #36
Just pathetic -- peer reviewed my ass Lettuce Be Nov 28 #17
Went through two peer reviews? haele Nov 28 #22
"The primary objectives of this research are ... To develop an explainable AI framework using TabPFNMix and SHAP for struggle4progress Nov 28 #23
I am running out of "disgusted" synonyms to really describe my reaction to this. hlthe2b Nov 28 #24
Just this morning I read about people inserting typos and mixed fonts... LAS14 Nov 28 #25
Cloudflare got shut down for 10 hours last week because of one typo in an executable file. Initech Nov 28 #29
It's crazy how fast we went from 0 to 60 on AI. Initech Nov 28 #30
This is tangential to this thread jfz9580m Saturday #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientific reports in the...»Reply #39