Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,531 posts)
22. Of course that's his view of the evidence. He was ready to indict the guy.
Thu Jan 1, 2026, 01:30 PM
Jan 1

Prosecutors don't go for an indictment if they don't think they have a good chance of winning.

I don't get it, really. There could be no "revelations" in Mr Smith's testimony, because we already know what he thought. Only if we had a line-by-line release of all the evidence he and his team collected would we find any revelations. His opinions, with respect, matter no more than anyone else's.

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Did you develop evidence...»Reply #22