Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all]Haggard Celine
(17,779 posts)2. I agree.
Elon Musk could've very comfortable on a small fraction of his assets. All that wealth gives him a lot of power to influence politicians and anyone else. What I'd really like to do is severely restrict how much influence these people have.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life...
wcmagumba
15 hrs ago
#1
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude?
PeaceWave
14 hrs ago
#18
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want
Stargazer99
9 hrs ago
#37
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much?
PeaceWave
15 hrs ago
#14
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after?
PeaceWave
14 hrs ago
#21
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number...
PeaceWave
14 hrs ago
#24
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery...
PeaceWave
13 hrs ago
#28
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections
AZJonnie
11 hrs ago
#36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts.
Scrivener7
7 hrs ago
#39
I was just thinking this morning that we didn't use to be so dependent on giant privately owned corporations.
Scrivener7
7 hrs ago
#38
Yes! AND stop giving them your money! I don't get why people won't do this.
Scrivener7
6 hrs ago
#42