Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceWave

(2,948 posts)
28. Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery...
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:07 AM
7 hrs ago

This is where we, as a party, lose voters. I sincerely look forward to furthering the discussion when you've thought it through a little more thoroughly. We're going to need a solid economic plan to present to voters in 2028. We can rail against Trump on social issues all we want, but reality is that he has ingratiated himself to voters with economic issues that should have belonged to Democrats (i.e., a doubling of the standard tax deduction, an increase in the tax exemption for Social Security income, tax exemptions on a portion of overtime, a $6,000 senior tax credit). These are kitchen economics issues that matter to average American households. When we present ourselves as a party wielding a cleaver instead of a scalpel, it does none of us any good.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all] Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago OP
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life... wcmagumba 9 hrs ago #1
I agree. Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #2
And get rid of stepped up basis TexasBushwhacker 9 hrs ago #6
They have it figured out, don't they? Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #10
And all that hoarding of capital TexasBushwhacker 8 hrs ago #11
I think they're trying to fix the economy so that it runs on Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #15
But that's not sustainable TexasBushwhacker 8 hrs ago #16
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude? PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #18
I think that's what we should shoot for. Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #19
That's what I wonder about too. AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #35
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want Stargazer99 3 hrs ago #37
ALL stepped up basis? Throwing the baby out with the bath water, isn't it? PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #12
Of course, and I have no problem with a spouse TexasBushwhacker 8 hrs ago #13
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much? PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #14
Not only that, markodochartaigh 7 hrs ago #29
Let them earn (or steal) as much money as they want but Marie Marie 9 hrs ago #3
I think that's fair. Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #5
Makes me sick! CountAllVotes 9 hrs ago #4
They think it all should be theirs. Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #8
Line em up VanceFan 9 hrs ago #7
A health care system would be a nice start. Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #9
Immigrants Aren't Stealing Your Jobs Mr.Bee 8 hrs ago #17
He said he was going after criminals and Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #22
And it isn't capitalism Figarosmom 8 hrs ago #20
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after? PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #21
Just like everything else, the government would have to decide Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #23
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number... PeaceWave 8 hrs ago #24
Well, any number is going to be Haggard Celine 7 hrs ago #27
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery... PeaceWave 7 hrs ago #28
I don't know all the laws about Haggard Celine 7 hrs ago #31
Found this book at the thriftstore Puppyjive 7 hrs ago #25
Reagan broke the guardrails that prevented this. I don't think live love laugh 7 hrs ago #26
On limiting how much people can accumulate canetoad 7 hrs ago #30
I just want to take a lot of the power Haggard Celine 6 hrs ago #32
Elon Musk canetoad 6 hrs ago #33
Well said! Haggard Celine 6 hrs ago #34
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections AZJonnie 5 hrs ago #36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts. Scrivener7 47 min ago #39
I was just thinking this morning that we didn't use to be so dependent on giant privately owned corporations. Scrivener7 48 min ago #38
Well said. Haggard Celine 22 min ago #41
You want them taken down a notch? OldBaldy1701E 28 min ago #40
Yes! AND stop giving them your money! I don't get why people won't do this. Scrivener7 16 min ago #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Need to Talk About Ric...»Reply #28