Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all]canetoad
(20,526 posts)30. On limiting how much people can accumulate
It seems more productive to have the hard decision on value versus cost. When people are both earning and paying a fair price/wage there is hope of equity. And hopefully less plastic bling being trucked around to pollute the planet.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life...
wcmagumba
11 hrs ago
#1
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude?
PeaceWave
10 hrs ago
#18
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want
Stargazer99
4 hrs ago
#37
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much?
PeaceWave
10 hrs ago
#14
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after?
PeaceWave
9 hrs ago
#21
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number...
PeaceWave
9 hrs ago
#24
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery...
PeaceWave
9 hrs ago
#28
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections
AZJonnie
6 hrs ago
#36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts.
Scrivener7
2 hrs ago
#39