Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

canetoad

(20,526 posts)
30. On limiting how much people can accumulate
Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:25 AM
8 hrs ago

It seems more productive to have the hard decision on value versus cost. When people are both earning and paying a fair price/wage there is hope of equity. And hopefully less plastic bling being trucked around to pollute the planet.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all] Haggard Celine 11 hrs ago OP
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life... wcmagumba 11 hrs ago #1
I agree. Haggard Celine 11 hrs ago #2
And get rid of stepped up basis TexasBushwhacker 10 hrs ago #6
They have it figured out, don't they? Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #10
And all that hoarding of capital TexasBushwhacker 10 hrs ago #11
I think they're trying to fix the economy so that it runs on Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #15
But that's not sustainable TexasBushwhacker 10 hrs ago #16
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude? PeaceWave 10 hrs ago #18
I think that's what we should shoot for. Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #19
That's what I wonder about too. AZJonnie 7 hrs ago #35
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want Stargazer99 4 hrs ago #37
ALL stepped up basis? Throwing the baby out with the bath water, isn't it? PeaceWave 10 hrs ago #12
Of course, and I have no problem with a spouse TexasBushwhacker 10 hrs ago #13
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much? PeaceWave 10 hrs ago #14
Not only that, markodochartaigh 9 hrs ago #29
Definitely a rigged system TexasBushwhacker 12 min ago #44
Let them earn (or steal) as much money as they want but Marie Marie 10 hrs ago #3
I think that's fair. Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #5
Makes me sick! CountAllVotes 10 hrs ago #4
They think it all should be theirs. Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #8
Line em up VanceFan 10 hrs ago #7
A health care system would be a nice start. Haggard Celine 10 hrs ago #9
Immigrants Aren't Stealing Your Jobs Mr.Bee 10 hrs ago #17
He said he was going after criminals and Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #22
ICE is hiring the criminals. Thus the need for masks. travelingthrulife 7 min ago #45
And it isn't capitalism Figarosmom 10 hrs ago #20
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after? PeaceWave 9 hrs ago #21
Just like everything else, the government would have to decide Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #23
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number... PeaceWave 9 hrs ago #24
Well, any number is going to be Haggard Celine 9 hrs ago #27
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery... PeaceWave 9 hrs ago #28
I don't know all the laws about Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #31
Found this book at the thriftstore Puppyjive 9 hrs ago #25
Reagan broke the guardrails that prevented this. I don't think live love laugh 9 hrs ago #26
On limiting how much people can accumulate canetoad 8 hrs ago #30
I just want to take a lot of the power Haggard Celine 8 hrs ago #32
Elon Musk canetoad 8 hrs ago #33
Well said! Haggard Celine 7 hrs ago #34
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections AZJonnie 6 hrs ago #36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts. Scrivener7 2 hrs ago #39
I was just thinking this morning that we didn't use to be so dependent on giant privately owned corporations. Scrivener7 2 hrs ago #38
Well said. Haggard Celine 1 hr ago #41
You want them taken down a notch? OldBaldy1701E 2 hrs ago #40
Yes! AND stop giving them your money! I don't get why people won't do this. Scrivener7 1 hr ago #42
Programming, my friend... programming. OldBaldy1701E 1 hr ago #43
Why are you cis flamingo 1 min ago #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Need to Talk About Ric...»Reply #30