Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We Need to Talk About Rich People [View all]Haggard Celine
(17,779 posts)31. I don't know all the laws about
taxes and Social Security and all of that. I'm just making general observations and talking about some things I would like to see change. The details can be worked out, but generally speaking, I think it would be a good thing to reduce excessive wealth. Pick a number, it will still be far above what will affect most people.
What I would like to see most of all right now is meaningful campaign finance reform. Without that, we'll never see real change. As long as the rich can buy politicians, we will continue the downward spiral.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've had the same thought. Nobody needs millions or billions of dollars in cash or properties to live a good life...
wcmagumba
17 hrs ago
#1
Texas, you have an answer for me regarding how much stepped up basis you're willing to exclude?
PeaceWave
16 hrs ago
#18
I often wonder how many of the common people do not understand this- no wonder the rich don't want
Stargazer99
11 hrs ago
#37
Okay, so you've already made an exception for a spouse. What about for children? And, how much?
PeaceWave
16 hrs ago
#14
OP, I notice that you didn't define either "wealthy" or "rich." How do we know who to go after?
PeaceWave
16 hrs ago
#21
Eventually though, these kinds of suggestions must narrow down to a specific number...
PeaceWave
15 hrs ago
#24
Without actual numbers regarding the taxation of wealth, the discussion collapses into vaguery...
PeaceWave
15 hrs ago
#28
The most doable thing with the best bang for buck is to invalidate Citizens United and force public funding of elections
AZJonnie
13 hrs ago
#36
It all goes back to that. And that goes back to the complete corruption of the Supreme Court under Roberts.
Scrivener7
8 hrs ago
#39
I was just thinking this morning that we didn't use to be so dependent on giant privately owned corporations.
Scrivener7
8 hrs ago
#38
Yes! AND stop giving them your money! I don't get why people won't do this.
Scrivener7
8 hrs ago
#42