Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Fiendish Thingy

(24,033 posts)
Fri May 8, 2026, 08:07 PM May 8

Gerrymandering's impact on the midterms for the mathematically challenged [View all]

(That includes me)

Republican seats added by Gerrymander:
TX +5
FL +4
TN +1
AL +1 (maybe)
LA +1
MO +1
NC +1
OH +1
——————
Total= 14-15 seats

Dem seats added by redistricting:

CA +5
UT +1 (yes you read that right)
—————-
Total= 6 seats

Now subtract the Dem gains from Republican gains:

14-15 - 6 = 8-9 net seat gain for Republicans.

Right now, Republicans have a five seat margin in the house, however, five seats are vacant. If all those seats were filled, as they were on January 3, 2025, the margin would be 3 seats.

So, 3 seat margin, + 8-9 seat gain via gerrymandering = 11-12 seat hypothetical margin.

Except, Dems are projected to pickup a minimum of 20-30 seats.

That gives Dems, at the very, very, bare minimum an 8 seat majority.

Now, some folks are projecting Dems could pick up as many as 40-50 seats. In 2018, when Trump’s approval ratings were higher than they are now, and inflation and the economy were doing much better, Dems picked up 40 seats.

And there’s (at least) one more factor to consider:

All that republican gerrymandering required some solid red districts to be weakened, and some of the new red districts aren’t that strong.

Remember this: throughout the past year, 2024 Trump +20 districts were swinging 15-30 points towards the Dems in actual elections, not just opinion polls.

So, if they took a Trump +20 district and turned it into a Trump +5 district in order to create another Trump +5 district out of a formerly Harris +5 district…can you do the math?

(If you can’t here’s, what it means: Dems could win both of those districts by 10+ points, if overperformance trends hold)

I’m not feeling cocky, I’m not over confident, but based on the data, including the fact that the Trump-induced, Republican-enabled suffering spreading across all regional, racial and partisan boundaries is only going to increase in the next six months, I draw this conclusion:

Nothing can stop the Blue Tsunami in November

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you for laying this out. mr715 May 8 #1
You are often right - I hope this opinion is also correct biophile May 8 #2
Some of those things are worth considering, others are not. Fiendish Thingy May 8 #4
You had me until the conclusion. Ilikepurple May 8 #3
Uncertainty cuts both ways Fiendish Thingy May 8 #5
K & R................. Lovie777 May 8 #6
That's another piece of math I didn't mention! Fiendish Thingy May 8 #8
I really hope you're right. ecstatic May 8 #7
There is plenty of evidence that republicans are already voting for Democratic candidates over the past year. Fiendish Thingy May 8 #9
That is not relevant to what is happening with our elections. gab13by13 May 8 #11
This comment (#11) is entirely irrelevant and quite unnecessary. Intractable May 8 #18
Sure it is. Nt Fiendish Thingy May 8 #20
Louisiana was in the middle of voting gab13by13 May 8 #10
Yeah, the rose-colored glasses some are wearing do not help at all. FoxNewsSucks May 8 #12
Here's the deal gab13by13 May 8 #14
Texass did that to Austin years ago. FoxNewsSucks May 8 #16
Votes will be the bullets in this gun fight Fiendish Thingy May 8 #21
So you are espousing the Schumer strategy? gab13by13 May 8 #24
Yeah, that's what I'm proposing- let Trump burn it all down. Fiendish Thingy May 8 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Fiendish Thingy May 8 #22
Agree. The Texas gerry was based on Hispanic Strelnikov_ May 8 #13
What does this have to do with Magats rigging elections? gab13by13 May 8 #15
What rigging? Fiendish Thingy May 8 #23
I stand by the word rigging. gab13by13 May 8 #26
Apathetic non voting citizens can most certainly get in the way. littlemissmartypants May 8 #17
Some People imagined they could afford to be apathetic in 2024 Fiendish Thingy May 8 #25
Kamala Harris won the election. gab13by13 May 8 #27
No. mr715 May 8 #31
2024 Election Denialism is just as kooky and evidence free as 2020 Election Denialism Fiendish Thingy May 8 #34
THANK YOU! 😊👍🤞🙏 🌊🌊🌊 ColoringFool May 8 #19
Gerrymandering chart Norrrm May 8 #28
Ah, but that presumes that all red voters will continue to vote red in 100% of races, 100% of the time Fiendish Thingy May 8 #30
And, just to bring up a point you and I agree on... mr715 May 8 #38
While court expansion must be Dems top priority in 2029, I don't think it has to be front and Center in the 2028 campaig Fiendish Thingy May 9 #39
Assuming a fixed electorate, which is not the case. mr715 May 8 #33
Pritzker I've read is considering countering the most recent red state redistricting. NoMoreRepugs May 8 #32
Yes, I expect many blue states will redistrict, but not in time for the midterms, but for 2028. Nt Fiendish Thingy May 8 #35
Those republican redistricts... Boo1 May 8 #36
And if the optimistic models are correct, mr715 May 8 #37
If 90 million people get off their asses and vote blue in the midterms IzzaNuDay May 9 #40
This edhopper May 9 #41
Keep Failing Open Book Tests Aepps22 May 9 #45
It won't even take 90 million Fiendish Thingy May 9 #42
I think we need a bigger edge edhopper May 9 #46
I dont Fiendish Thingy May 9 #47
Yep edhopper May 9 #48
I am not mathematically challenged, but thanks for a concise portrayal jimmy the one May 9 #43
Given the environment, some of those TX seats are dummymandered JCMach1 May 9 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gerrymandering's impact o...