Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cachukis

(4,119 posts)
31. No question. One of my worries is the takeover of
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 02:23 PM
20 hrs ago

market responsibility having moved to an algorithmic response. It has simply made money for the sake of money. A wilfull blindness.
Visualize, the manager talking to his sales team asking for reports of progress, strategies, and successes and failures of activity during the last six months. The reps ask AI to accumulate the data and they turn that in. The manager gathers this information and asks his AI agent to assemble this in reportable form and submits it to his boss.
That boss is a computer that decides the next step.
We are already here.
Reminds me of Malthus predicting population growth would be subject to food supply.
Reminds me of a conversation I had with my wife's best friend some years ago in Paris, TN.
I asked her why the poorest people in Kentucky continued to vote against Obamacare. They actually received benefits from Kenect (sic) the Kentucky version of Obamacare. She said their pride in overcoming hardship was a motivating factor. They couldn't afford dentists, but the occassional success of brandishing a tattoo, while small, mattered a lot.
Business resilience seems to be holding for now.
Saw through the pandemic where many of the predictions of economic calamity turned out to be underwhelming. The tariffs were supposed to cause much strife, but businesses, having raised their prices during the pandemic without reducing them later, were able to assuage pricing increases to less than what was expected.
At some point, the cavalcade of economic pressures might blow the steamer, but so far the whistles, while disquieting, have kept the engine still running.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The shit is on the wing orangecrush Yesterday #1
The storage cushion is fudgy. bucolic_frolic Yesterday #2
President Bone Spurs had a plan to get out of Vietnam. Emile Yesterday #3
Daddy's not buying his way out of this one. dem4decades Yesterday #4
From another perspective cachukis Yesterday #5
there's definitely been some adaptation... but still a lot has been kept afloat by the reserves that are likely to run LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #27
No question. One of my worries is the takeover of cachukis 20 hrs ago #31
Absolutely. I totally agree on all those points. The stock market is particularly a mess IMO LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #32
Have invested mostly in real estate over the last cachukis 19 hrs ago #34
Why would " Diesel goes first"??? Melon Yesterday #6
800,000 to 1.2 million SamuelTheThird Yesterday #11
It's one country. Multiply across all oil producing Melon 17 hrs ago #41
Yes, but the key is how long the strait stays closed and how quickly the reserves run out LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #28
Diesel is often made from mideastern crude while gasoline is made from US crude JT45242 20 hrs ago #30
Not In The US, Though ProfessorGAC 2 hrs ago #45
Completely wrong. GreatGazoo Yesterday #7
lol@your link SamuelTheThird Yesterday #10
You ignored all the numbers to nitpick about semantics GreatGazoo Yesterday #15
Are America's strategic reserves at a 40 year low right before the summer season? SamuelTheThird Yesterday #19
Traders in Singapore, Beijing and Mumbai aren't duped by whatever Trump says GreatGazoo 19 hrs ago #36
This message was self-deleted by its author LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #29
Futures Are Not Delivery modrepub 18 hrs ago #39
"futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes GreatGazoo 15 hrs ago #42
Future Prices Are Not Necessarily modrepub 4 hrs ago #43
No. For anyone holding a March contract at $63 their price in March was $63 GreatGazoo 3 hrs ago #44
Appreciate your insight as I'm an admitted economic idiot. I can see where Exxon would be trying to "warn" Cheezoholic 22 hrs ago #21
Futures lock in a price right now GreatGazoo 21 hrs ago #22
Admittedly, Im no expert or even amateur...but SamuelTheThird 19 hrs ago #35
Since oil is sold as futures there is more profit when buyers panic about the future GreatGazoo 19 hrs ago #37
All hinging on a deal that isn't going to happen SamuelTheThird 19 hrs ago #38
Last week Exxon Mobil warned that oil inventories will fall to record low levels in coming weeks LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #33
Demand destruction WSHazel Yesterday #8
"one of the key reasons that Trump started this conflict was to increase energy prices"-- agree LymphocyteLover 20 hrs ago #25
And it's all part of the plan... 2naSalit Yesterday #9
Excellent summation. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #12
I don't think the Strait of Hormuz never reopening is going to happen, but it will not reopen without a major shock ToxMarz Yesterday #13
Agree. Thanks for the link. LymphocyteLover 21 hrs ago #24
Kick dalton99a Yesterday #14
MAGA does the full collapse kairos12 Yesterday #16
First the bastids want to grift off it, if they can. GreenWave Yesterday #17
But I thouight it would be open in two weeks. AverageOldGuy Yesterday #18
That's the point. Blue Full Moon Yesterday #20
Unbelievably awful LymphocyteLover 21 hrs ago #23
It's happening now as we speak. marble falls 20 hrs ago #26
Remember that the UAE left OPEC a few weeks ago WSHazel 18 hrs ago #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Strait of Hormuz d...»Reply #31