Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Rubio reiterates Trump's view that Canada 'would be better off' as a US state [View all]Jarqui
(10,636 posts)13. I still don't get this claim:
"... Canada can't survive unless it treats the U.S. unfairly in trade."
.....
He complained about the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and said the United States doesnt need Canadian products.
.....
He complained about the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and said the United States doesnt need Canadian products.
Trump claims the US doesnt need Canadian products (but buys a lot of them). So if the US is that unhappy with Canada's treatment of them in trade, why not buy the products from another country or make them in the US instead?
If Canada truly can't survive unless it treats the US unfairly then don't buy from them and Canada will have mend its ways or not survive.
Consumers can conclude if they don't like shopping at Amazon, they can buy elsewhere like Walmart. Where is it in the USMCA that the US can't do that?
A very simple fix to the US-Canada trade deficit is to buy from another country - US-Canada trade deficit solved. Canada doesn't get to tell the US what to buy and from where.
Trump overhauled NAFTA with USMCA which went into force in Jan 2020
https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement
Chapter 31 of the agreement deals with various methods for dispute resolution.
Chapter 10 also covers Disputes.
So why isn't Trump using the dispute resolution he helped devise to address the unfairness he claims?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Rubio reiterates Trump's view that Canada 'would be better off' as a US state [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Apr 28
OP
we had a two week break from this crap now they are back with the Greenland/Canada/Panama saber rattling.
Blues Heron
Apr 28
#2
If you include services (as we should), Canada is subsidizing the US. But of course trade is never a subsidy. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 28
#32
Just throw your lying self under the bus Rubio, and save some time. You are now worthless.
58Sunliner
Apr 28
#16
To USA Republicans...Canadians also have those things called "Weapons" and they would use them.
chouchou
Apr 28
#23
Rubio, "but we actually don't like the way they treated us when it comes to trade."
Botany
Apr 28
#24
I'm not sure anybody takes this seriously. If Canada became a state, it would be a Blue state with a lot of
Martin68
Apr 28
#25
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying there is no "if" because Canada will definitely become a state, or
Martin68
Apr 28
#33
There is zero possibility "Cnadada" will become the 51st or 52nd or any state of the US. There is no "if" about it. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 28
#34
There actually is a possibility because there is so much talk these days about US Civil War 2 and martial law. . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 28
#37
I used "if" in this case not to suggest it as a realistic possibilty, but to express an opinion on one reason it would
Martin68
Apr 28
#42
I don't quite understand your point, but I understand you are upset. But I'm not sure why your are so determined to
Martin68
Apr 28
#46
Just because there will be no 51st state does not mean I think "Canada is safe from tRump"
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 29
#47
You are an argumentative fellow! By "safe from Trump" I was merely agreeing with you that Canada will never become a
Martin68
Wednesday
#49
tRump & Rubio so stupid they think they are helping Pierre "Slogans R Us" Poilievre. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 28
#28
No...no they wouldn't...hey little marko shut up about Canada. Nobody wants to hear it!
PortTack
Apr 28
#29
Rubio's views 'would be better off' if he unplugged his head from trump ass.
republianmushroom
Apr 29
#48