Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(156,998 posts)

4. They have to clearly show "harm" to themselves

Reply to thesquanderer (Reply #3)

Thu May 22, 2025, 08:14 AM

May 22

"as states", or the judge will throw the case out. There have already been cases thrown out regarding various illegal crap that 45 has done due to lack of standing and/or an inability for the person or entity to definitively "show" how the actions negatively impact them (some of the judges are really sticklers on that).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US states mount court challenge to Trump's tariffs [View all] BumRushDaShow May 21 OP

These tariffs are clearly illegal LetMyPeopleVote May 21 #1

Nor is there one to justify anything else this administration has done. It's ridiculous that a president can declare a Karasu May 21 #2

I wonder what took them so long! (n/t) thesquanderer May 21 #3

They have to clearly show "harm" to themselves BumRushDaShow May 22 #4

Ah. It is a flaw in our system that something that will clearly cause harm can't be adjudicated... thesquanderer May 22 #5

That's basically what it boils down to. BumRushDaShow May 22 #6

A provision in the proposed budget bill could limit the ability Emile May 22 #7