Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(65,621 posts)
Tue May 27, 2025, 12:04 PM May 27

Gorsuch, Thomas dissent as Supreme Court declines to take up Apache challenge to copper mine [View all]

Source: The Hill

COURT BATTLES
Gorsuch, Thomas dissent as Supreme Court declines to take up Apache challenge to copper mine

BY RACHEL FRAZIN 05/27/25 11:04 AM ET

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a challenge to a land swap enabling mining at a sacred Indigenous site, garnering pushback from conservative justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas.

A 2014 law enabled a land transfer between mining company Resolution Copper and the federal government, allowing the miner to take control of a site called Oak Flat in Arizona, which is sacred to the Western Apache. ... A group called Apache Stronghold, which says it represents Apaches, other Native peoples, and non-Native allies, appealed the case to the Supreme Court, asking it to reverse a 9th Circuit decision on religious freedom grounds.

The high court declined to take up the case Tuesday without explaining its decision. However, Gorsuch issued a dissent, joined by Thomas.

"For centuries, Western Apaches have worshipped at Ch'chil Biłdagoteel, or Oak Flat. They consider the site a sacred and 'direct corridor to the Creator,'" Gorsuch wrote. " Now, the government and a mining conglomerate want to turn Oak Flat into a massive hole in the ground."

{snip}

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5319722-gorsuch-thomas-dissent-apache-copper-mine/amp/



https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/052725zor_p8k0.pdf

I expect Gorsuch and Thomas will receive great praise at DU for their dissent.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For christ's sake, how many times are white men going to screw over our indigenous people? Midnight Writer May 27 #1
Theft of Indigenous lands Bayard May 27 #6
And in this case, all of the Court's women Polybius May 27 #14
6-2 to deny. "ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition." mahatmakanejeeves May 28 #15
SCOTUS seems passive-aggressive & contrarian bucolic_frolic May 27 #2
Well, the two dissents only underscore the "broken clock" theory... hlthe2b May 27 #3
And here is direct evidence of how "religious freedom" slightlv May 27 #4
I will be interested to see how the Apaches respond. TomSlick May 27 #5
Makes me wonder what Gorsuch's and Thomas' true motivations are. Torchlight May 27 #7
Gorsuch has long been a strong advocate for indigenous rights. mahatmakanejeeves May 27 #8
Between his Dobbs' decision Torchlight May 27 #9
it's an op, like maggats always do DoBW May 27 #12
I donʻt understand this. Iʻm under a fair amount of stress and time stress too atm but this makes no sense to me. mahina May 27 #10
Gorsuch has a strong history in siding with Native American issues before the court, so his vote I get Polybius May 27 #13
Agree! Where the hell are we? bluestarone May 28 #16
FAFO...wannabe John Galts spawn George Haydukes. pecosbob May 27 #11
The big issue is the land is not reservation land but Federal Land.. EX500rider May 28 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gorsuch, Thomas dissent a...