Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Senators push for ban on drug ads, citing $5 billion in annual pharmaceutical spending [View all]DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)25. Big Pharma
would not be the only losers, think of all that lost revenue in the Media...........
WASF
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Senators push for ban on drug ads, citing $5 billion in annual pharmaceutical spending [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jun 13
OP
There are only 2 countrioes on the planet that allow Pharma to advertise prescription drugs.
Bluetus
Jun 13
#38
I was about to say something similar. In many cases, it seems some of the side effects...
the nelm
Jun 14
#51
And lets not forget the long list of "side effects" they include at the end of the commercial....
Xolodno
Jun 13
#32
I think the vast Majority of all ads I see lately are for drug ads!!I am watching one on msnbc right now!!
riversedge
Jun 13
#35
"You can't just go to your doctor and say I have type 2 diabetes and I want Jardiance."
BumRushDaShow
Jun 14
#50
They dominate the airwaves and it is disgusting. People in UK were apalled when they saw
Evolve Dammit
Jun 14
#49