Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 93 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The US military used a 30...»Reply #8
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: The US military used a 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb for the first time in combat in strikes on Iranian nuke sites [View all]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

vanessa_ca
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The US military used a 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb for the first time in combat in strikes on Iranian nuke sites [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 22 OP
Trump just had to prove that he's the alpha male instead of the historically ignorant fool. Lonestarblue Jun 22 #1
Once these bombs became a big part of the conversation, it was D. Spaulding Jun 22 #2
Trump did something similar in 2017 with a 21,600 lbs MOAB weapon on Afghan caves IronLionZion Jun 22 #5
Gee, I wonder.... ShazzieB Jun 22 #22
The real threat to the US is in the White House or at Taco-lago. twodogsbarking Jun 22 #3
Bunker buster bombs are necessary for at least 3 reasons: ancianita Jun 22 #4
But then Iran has been supplying Russia with weapons (drones, etc) to attack Ukraine BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #6
I see. Makes sense. I've also read that Russia gets some weapons from China, too, and that Russia ancianita Jun 22 #13
China hasn't actually been "at war" with anyone except some border skirmishes here and there and their practice drills BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #15
Exactly. It's more short/long term profitable to be the supplier country than the warring country. ancianita Jun 22 #16
China is busy with their "Belt and Road" initiative BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #17
Yep, that's the name of it. ancianita Jun 22 #18
China profits in the background manicdem Jun 22 #19
Bunker buster bombs are needed to stop Iranian attacks on Israel once and for all, ancianita Jun 22 #7
"once and for all" speak easy Jun 22 #8
Of course, no reprisals or vengeance - Maine-i-ac Jun 22 #12
With B-2 bombers hitting deep underground centrifuges, Israel could at least get some respite from the 15 ancianita Jun 22 #14
Thank you for putting this in perspective question everything Jun 22 #20
Lunatics. Passages Jun 22 #9
He wanted to use nukes, but they wouldn't let him. malthaussen Jun 22 #10
if they build it the war will come stillcool Jun 22 #11
Well strike up the freakin' band and have a parade. The US built a giant bomb and exploded it. twodogsbarking Jun 22 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The US military used a 30...»Reply #8
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2025 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.