Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Will not sit idly by': DOJ sues to prevent Catholic priests from violating secrecy of confessional by having to report [View all]malthaussen
(18,281 posts)No one is going to be idiot enough to confess to something that will be reported to law enforcement. That should be simple enough to comprehend.
Given this fact, the question becomes one of the sanctity of a sacrament, and the State's right to deny that sanctity at pleasure.
"Separation of Church and State" should work both ways. And while it is certainly true that many religions violate this separation, that is no excuse for the State to fail to hold up its end of the bargain.
Whether one thinks "confession is good for the soul" or not (I don't; I'm not sold on the ideas of souls in the first place), the sacrament is designed with that belief, and participated in with that belief. I do not think it is proper for the State to interfere with that.
You ask a couple of inflammatory questions with the expectation that they are rhetorical, that any human being would be prepared to violate a principle if someone close to him were injured. Surprisingly, it is not so cut-and-dried as all that. But it is certainly intellectually dishonest manipulation of the most overt kind.
-- Mal
Edit history
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):