Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(158,897 posts)

5. This was one of the "early" cases filed (back in February)

Fri Jun 27, 2025, 04:34 PM

Jun 27

where it was primarily "organizations" or "states" (or other local government entities) filing on behalf of employees or residents.

And it basically boiled down to judges telling them that they could not "show harm" to those organizations or states themselves (even if it "harmed" their members or residents).

So the later cases have usually included the organizations and/or states, etc., PLUS some "individual" (or group of people) who then could argue that they (those individuals) were being "harmed".

Those that did it that way have since mostly been successful.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TheRickles benfranklin1776 Rhiannon12866

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge rules DOGE can access personal data despite invasion of privacy claims [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 27 OP

The sound of democracy dying... happy feet Jun 27 #1

The court stands ready to remedy plaintiffs' harm, Bayard Jun 27 #2

bates was appointed by chimpy. niyad Jun 27 #3

There was no difference between Bush and Gore, right? displacedvermoter Jun 27 #6

Question? lonely bird Jun 27 #4

This was one of the "early" cases filed (back in February) BumRushDaShow Jun 27 #5

Ain't that a bitch .... live love laugh Jun 28 #7

Freeze your credit bureau accounts. There's no way in Hell they can see what your credit is if you do that. 634-5789 Jun 28 #8

Courts turning over everything to Hitler Trump and Musk. Irish_Dem Jun 28 #9

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 28 #10

This is a data gathering project to support Palantir dlk Jun 28 #11

So good of this judge to stand ready to remedy the harm after it's done! Lonestarblue Jun 28 #12